Tools & Wizards About Us
fileocool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

fileocool.com

Loading...

Page Load Speed

21.6 sec in total

First Response

634 ms

Resources Loaded

20.9 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

fileocool.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fileocool.com now to see the best up-to-date Fileocool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fileocool.com

ファイル無料転送サービス。大容量ファイルを無料でメール送信。無料・登録不要の簡易オンラインストレージ

Visit fileocool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fileocool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 634 ms and then it took 21 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

fileocool.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.267

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fileocool.com

634 ms

urchin.js

13 ms

badge.js

20225 ms

sp.gif

178 ms

title.gif

346 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Fileocool.com, 33% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 17% (1 request) were made to Go2web20.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Go2web20.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 kB (28%)

Content Size

9.9 kB

After Optimization

7.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Fileocool.com main page is 9.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 6.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 3.0 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 60% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fileocool. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

fileocool.com

fileocool.com

634 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

13 ms

badge.js

badge.js

20225 ms

sp.gif

sp.gif

178 ms

title.gif

title.gif

346 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

5 ms

Accessibility Review

fileocool.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

fileocool.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

fileocool.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fileocool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Japanese. Our system also found out that Fileocool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fileocool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fileocool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: