Tools & Wizards About Us
filerecoveryreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

filerecoveryreview.com

File Recovery Software - Free Data Recovery Software

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

525 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

5.8 sec

filerecoveryreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to filerecoveryreview.com homepage info - get ready to check File Recovery Review best content right away, or after learning these important things about filerecoveryreview.com

Download Free File Recovery Software. Award winning, most trusted - over 5 million downloads. Recover the files and data from corrupted disk or hard drive

Visit filerecoveryreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filerecoveryreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filerecoveryreview.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filerecoveryreview.com

525 ms

filerecovery.css

37 ms

addthis_widget.js

263 ms

file-recovery.gif

2969 ms

data-recovery-wizard-icon.png

2970 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Filerecoveryreview.com, 6% (1 request) were made to S7.addthis.com and 6% (1 request) were made to M.addthisedge.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Filerecoveryreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 301.2 kB (54%)

Content Size

557.6 kB

After Optimization

256.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filerecoveryreview.com main page is 557.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 488.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 18.5 kB

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 36.1 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. File Recovery Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 275.0 kB

  • Original 488.2 kB
  • After minification 488.0 kB
  • After compression 213.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 275.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filerecoveryreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Recovery Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filerecoveryreview.com

filerecoveryreview.com

525 ms

filerecovery.css

filerecovery.css

37 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

263 ms

file-recovery.gif

file-recovery.gif

2969 ms

data-recovery-wizard-icon.png

data-recovery-wizard-icon.png

2970 ms

recovermyfiles-icon.png

recovermyfiles-icon.png

2971 ms

diskdoctors-windows-recovery-icon.png

diskdoctors-windows-recovery-icon.png

2971 ms

menu_bg.gif

menu_bg.gif

2967 ms

menu_l_img.gif

menu_l_img.gif

2805 ms

menu_r_img.gif

menu_r_img.gif

2804 ms

simple_bg.gif

simple_bg.gif

2803 ms

simple_img_top.gif

simple_img_top.gif

2804 ms

h2_welcome.gif

h2_welcome.gif

2809 ms

body_img_bottom.gif

body_img_bottom.gif

2809 ms

_ate.track.config_resp

_ate.track.config_resp

961 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

456 ms

Sub_ul_li.gif

Sub_ul_li.gif

432 ms

Accessibility Review

filerecoveryreview.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

filerecoveryreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

filerecoveryreview.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filerecoveryreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filerecoveryreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filerecoveryreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Recovery Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: