Tools & Wizards About Us
filerestoreplus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

filerestoreplus.com

FileRestorePlus – Powerful File Recovery for Windows

Page Load Speed

697 ms in total

First Response

10 ms

Resources Loaded

460 ms

Page Rendered

227 ms

filerestoreplus.com screenshot

About Website

Visit filerestoreplus.com now to see the best up-to-date File Restore Plus content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filerestoreplus.com

The best file recovery tool to easily restore deleted documents, photos, video, music, and emails. If you need support – our team is here to help.

Visit filerestoreplus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filerestoreplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 687 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filerestoreplus.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filerestoreplus.com

10 ms

www.filerestoreplus.com

26 ms

www.filerestoreplus.com

33 ms

bootstrap.min.css

14 ms

main.css

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Filerestoreplus.com, 21% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 11% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (383 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.jsdelivr.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

757.8 kB

After Optimization

689.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filerestoreplus.com main page is 757.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 730.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 55.5 kB

  • Original 730.0 kB
  • After minification 674.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. File Restore Plus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 341 B

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filerestoreplus.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Restore Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filerestoreplus.com

filerestoreplus.com

10 ms

www.filerestoreplus.com

www.filerestoreplus.com

26 ms

www.filerestoreplus.com

www.filerestoreplus.com

33 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

14 ms

main.css

main.css

6 ms

wm.min.js

wm.min.js

383 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

68 ms

logo.png

logo.png

15 ms

dl_shield_badge.php

dl_shield_badge.php

94 ms

svg-with-js.min.css

svg-with-js.min.css

238 ms

screen1.png

screen1.png

13 ms

screen2.png

screen2.png

18 ms

screen3.png

screen3.png

14 ms

screen4.png

screen4.png

18 ms

panel1.png

panel1.png

15 ms

panel2.png

panel2.png

16 ms

consent.min.js

consent.min.js

143 ms

js

js

57 ms

wmcaudit.js

wmcaudit.js

21 ms

Accessibility Review

filerestoreplus.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

filerestoreplus.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

filerestoreplus.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filerestoreplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filerestoreplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filerestoreplus.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Restore Plus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: