Access filerox.com. Download Software for Windows PC | Filerox

filerox.com screenshot

27

Performance

Renders faster than
46% of other websites
50

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 21% of websites
67

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
24% of websites
86

SEO

Google-friendlier than
60% of websites

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

986 ms

filerox.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to filerox.com homepage info - get ready to check Filerox best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about filerox.com

Looking to download best apps for your device than visit Filerox.com, offering you Facebook , YouTube, Garena Free Fire, whatsapp desktop, counter-strik...

Visit filerox.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filerox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.121

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

20/100

10%

filerox.com

27 ms

en.filerox.com

1157 ms

js

67 ms

jquery.min.js

28 ms

d2uu46itxfd65q.cloudfront.net

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 153 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Filerox.com, 94% (144 requests) were made to Static.filerox.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to En.filerox.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source En.filerox.com.

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Filerox.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 214.7 kB

Original 258.2 kB
After minification 258.2 kB
After compression 43.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

Original 2.4 MB
After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filerox images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 31.0 kB
After minification 31.0 kB
After compression 31.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

149

After Optimization

134

The browser has sent 149 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filerox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filerox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filerox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filerox.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filerox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: