34.1 sec in total
1.4 sec
29.7 sec
3 sec
Visit filetransfers.de now to see the best up-to-date Filetransfers content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filetransfers.de
Visit filetransfers.deWe analyzed Filetransfers.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 32.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
filetransfers.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
1402 ms
1124 ms
1354 ms
3666 ms
439 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Filetransfers.de, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Filetransfers.de.
Page size can be reduced by 502.1 kB (64%)
784.8 kB
282.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Filetransfers.de main page is 784.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 234.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 48.0 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.5 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filetransfers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 179.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filetransfers.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (34%)
89
59
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filetransfers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
filetransfers.de
1402 ms
1124 ms
1354 ms
3666 ms
bootstrap.css
439 ms
jquery.fs.selecter.css
300 ms
scojs.css
399 ms
theme.css
285 ms
font-awesome.css
313 ms
refineslide.css
399 ms
refineslide-theme-dark.css
408 ms
jquery.fs.scroller.css
447 ms
jquery.fs.picker.css
558 ms
default.css
560 ms
jquery.js
661 ms
jquery.fs.selecter.js
559 ms
jquery.fs.picker.js
588 ms
jquery.fs.scroller.js
703 ms
jquery.refineslide.js
817 ms
bootstrap.js
824 ms
theme.js
865 ms
sco.modal.js
867 ms
sco.confirm.js
876 ms
sco.ajax.js
878 ms
sco.collapse.js
1375 ms
sco.countdown.js
887 ms
sco.message.js
922 ms
default.js
939 ms
1520 ms
css
82 ms
css
124 ms
329 ms
367 ms
745 ms
324 ms
318 ms
321 ms
361 ms
440 ms
358 ms
649 ms
1162 ms
466 ms
468 ms
550 ms
640 ms
646 ms
732 ms
857 ms
893 ms
858 ms
859 ms
989 ms
996 ms
994 ms
1058 ms
1057 ms
1818 ms
1116 ms
20485 ms
1654 ms
1772 ms
1251 ms
20475 ms
1392 ms
1557 ms
20191 ms
1526 ms
1625 ms
1749 ms
f8OBjBbevvywgbyJOxlO7Q.ttf
251 ms
AwBqWF2kjhlybWamaKMPcaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
413 ms
yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
418 ms
TttUCfJ272GBgSKaOaD7KqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
418 ms
kpI87QY2ce-mk2ZnKb-r0g.ttf
416 ms
1TiHc9yag0wq3lDO9cw0vqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
415 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
3466 ms
2265 ms
1937 ms
2645 ms
2449 ms
2537 ms
2729 ms
3200 ms
2731 ms
2863 ms
3008 ms
3184 ms
3402 ms
3124 ms
3202 ms
3684 ms
3199 ms
3303 ms
3363 ms
3542 ms
3492 ms
3656 ms
3754 ms
3572 ms
3567 ms
3545 ms
fs-selecter-arrow.png
3428 ms
filetransfers.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
filetransfers.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
filetransfers.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filetransfers.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is German. Our system also found out that Filetransfers.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filetransfers.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filetransfers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: