Tools & Wizards About Us
filewire.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

filewire.net

Filewire - Easy to use File and Data Transfer software - Secure File Transfer

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

777 ms

Page Rendered

503 ms

filewire.net screenshot

About Website

Visit filewire.net now to see the best up-to-date Filewire content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filewire.net

Easily exchange business data and files externally with Filewire file transfer. Log transfer activities with an audit trail. Charge microtransactions for data access

Visit filewire.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Filewire.net page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filewire.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.316

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filewire.net

120 ms

css

32 ms

bootstrap.min.css

98 ms

simple-line-icons.css

53 ms

font-awesome.min.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Filewire.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (578 ms) belongs to the original domain Filewire.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (70%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filewire.net main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 51.8 kB

  • Original 60.4 kB
  • After minification 34.0 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.4 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 328.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 864.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filewire needs image optimization as it can save up to 328.1 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 490.0 kB

  • Original 732.0 kB
  • After minification 661.1 kB
  • After compression 242.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 490.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 234.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filewire.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (73%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filewire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filewire.net

filewire.net

120 ms

css

css

32 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

98 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

53 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

58 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

54 ms

slick.css

slick.css

18 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

40 ms

settings.css

settings.css

33 ms

layers.css

layers.css

86 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

102 ms

unify.css

unify.css

258 ms

styles.op-lawyer.css

styles.op-lawyer.css

286 ms

custom.css

custom.css

78 ms

logo.png

logo.png

102 ms

1600x1066.jpg

1600x1066.jpg

578 ms

OneClick1200x800.jpg

OneClick1200x800.jpg

135 ms

InboxOutbox.jpg

InboxOutbox.jpg

130 ms

ComplexFTP.jpg

ComplexFTP.jpg

572 ms

ScreenShot-OutboxOnly.png

ScreenShot-OutboxOnly.png

141 ms

ScreenShot-InboxOnly.png

ScreenShot-InboxOnly.png

145 ms

Medical.png

Medical.png

193 ms

SpectrumHealth.jpg

SpectrumHealth.jpg

147 ms

eglin.jpg

eglin.jpg

166 ms

MiamiDade.jpg

MiamiDade.jpg

192 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

199 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

191 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

196 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

205 ms

appear.js

appear.js

204 ms

slick.js

slick.js

214 ms

gmaps.min.js

gmaps.min.js

211 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

227 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

224 ms

revolution.addon.slicey.min.js

revolution.addon.slicey.min.js

229 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

232 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

233 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

236 ms

js

js

52 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

326 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

314 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

309 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

297 ms

hs.core.js

hs.core.js

296 ms

hs.header.js

hs.header.js

293 ms

hs.hamburgers.js

hs.hamburgers.js

272 ms

hs.scroll-nav.js

hs.scroll-nav.js

262 ms

hs.carousel.js

hs.carousel.js

249 ms

hs.map.js

hs.map.js

247 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

149 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

188 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

188 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

188 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

123 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

122 ms

Accessibility Review

filewire.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

filewire.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

filewire.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filewire.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filewire.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filewire.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filewire. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: