Tools & Wizards About Us
filminglocationwanted.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

filminglocationwanted.com

FilmLocationsWanted. List Film Location Property – Filming Location Rentals Worldwide

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

362 ms

filminglocationwanted.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filming Location Wanted content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filminglocationwanted.com

Film Location Rentals database directory. List or search homes, businesses and unique property for film, television, movies and photography projects. Generate income.

Visit filminglocationwanted.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filminglocationwanted.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filminglocationwanted.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.358

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filminglocationwanted.com

3012 ms

autoptimize_single_e5c5b349786624c31b3b25fa35b0562d.css

113 ms

style.min.css

261 ms

theme.min.css

198 ms

autoptimize_single_4bc19d35d9e5befbc0d4ac845aab7f5b.css

175 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Filminglocationwanted.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Filminglocationwanted.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (46%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filminglocationwanted.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 119.5 kB

  • Original 148.5 kB
  • After minification 148.5 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 63.9 kB

  • Original 577.5 kB
  • After minification 513.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filming Location Wanted needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 719.6 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 590.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 719.6 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 113.7 kB

  • Original 174.9 kB
  • After minification 174.7 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filminglocationwanted.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (85%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filming Location Wanted. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filminglocationwanted.com

filminglocationwanted.com

3012 ms

autoptimize_single_e5c5b349786624c31b3b25fa35b0562d.css

autoptimize_single_e5c5b349786624c31b3b25fa35b0562d.css

113 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

261 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

198 ms

autoptimize_single_4bc19d35d9e5befbc0d4ac845aab7f5b.css

autoptimize_single_4bc19d35d9e5befbc0d4ac845aab7f5b.css

175 ms

autoptimize_single_2b161b36c5ec8457c1e02719dfbc3cf5.css

autoptimize_single_2b161b36c5ec8457c1e02719dfbc3cf5.css

176 ms

autoptimize_single_1e35acac5c0aa8c54864217638dac298.css

autoptimize_single_1e35acac5c0aa8c54864217638dac298.css

181 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

247 ms

css

css

45 ms

all.css

all.css

41 ms

autoptimize_single_32b4aba785288c62a64bf5265df590f6.css

autoptimize_single_32b4aba785288c62a64bf5265df590f6.css

242 ms

autoptimize_single_5fec30bdaa0954a4746ebfdd5675c072.css

autoptimize_single_5fec30bdaa0954a4746ebfdd5675c072.css

234 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

249 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

318 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

472 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

305 ms

autoptimize_single_d91f3cef00a21c1f34e9ec59d0e57283.js

autoptimize_single_d91f3cef00a21c1f34e9ec59d0e57283.js

304 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

311 ms

n2-j.min.js

n2-j.min.js

326 ms

nextend-gsap.min.js

nextend-gsap.min.js

455 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

545 ms

smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js

smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js

331 ms

particle.min.js

particle.min.js

336 ms

nextend-webfontloader.min.js

nextend-webfontloader.min.js

385 ms

autoptimize_single_1ed2a905ff712bbc8e285ddcc92d3446.css

autoptimize_single_1ed2a905ff712bbc8e285ddcc92d3446.css

390 ms

autoptimize_single_3b56c5f7a71d8763e5cf32577a1eb883.css

autoptimize_single_3b56c5f7a71d8763e5cf32577a1eb883.css

399 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

477 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

32 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

38 ms

in.js

in.js

34 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

517 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

477 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

484 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

559 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

515 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

521 ms

autoptimize_single_2fdf3cc1d0fcf824759f5287d4bd7b74.js

autoptimize_single_2fdf3cc1d0fcf824759f5287d4bd7b74.js

559 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

614 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

614 ms

jquery.newsTicker.min.js

jquery.newsTicker.min.js

615 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

715 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

714 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

663 ms

colormag-custom.min.js

colormag-custom.min.js

602 ms

jscripts-ftr2-min.js

jscripts-ftr2-min.js

601 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

592 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

582 ms

autoptimize_single_5fecb353d982190368ce74d3d04168a5.js

autoptimize_single_5fecb353d982190368ce74d3d04168a5.js

544 ms

autoptimize_single_3668c0c8cde8773a85ab8a47a8b923f3.js

autoptimize_single_3668c0c8cde8773a85ab8a47a8b923f3.js

532 ms

autoptimize_single_8bf2a99e1f18471b3719f75dae216dc8.js

autoptimize_single_8bf2a99e1f18471b3719f75dae216dc8.js

532 ms

jquery.sgcolorbox-min.js

jquery.sgcolorbox-min.js

530 ms

autoptimize_single_3ae1cfc4e597a4cbfaaee4d0889808cb.js

autoptimize_single_3ae1cfc4e597a4cbfaaee4d0889808cb.js

517 ms

autoptimize_single_7ddc5f28947f1be0f1b148f2f546bc96.js

autoptimize_single_7ddc5f28947f1be0f1b148f2f546bc96.js

495 ms

autoptimize_single_37e7e52f651b323aaf3d9ec1ecda5062.js

autoptimize_single_37e7e52f651b323aaf3d9ec1ecda5062.js

496 ms

autoptimize_single_0fa712fe73e5d3ee58cae1349baaf4e9.js

autoptimize_single_0fa712fe73e5d3ee58cae1349baaf4e9.js

491 ms

autoptimize_single_21e8cc4e230f00e0c529437c0d2f3e64.js

autoptimize_single_21e8cc4e230f00e0c529437c0d2f3e64.js

647 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

596 ms

css

css

30 ms

FilmingLocationWantedLogoorig-1.png

FilmingLocationWantedLogoorig-1.png

305 ms

Castle-Von-Frandsen.jpg

Castle-Von-Frandsen.jpg

355 ms

gammons-gulch-western-town.jpg

gammons-gulch-western-town.jpg

354 ms

los-angeles-filming-location-rentals.jpg

los-angeles-filming-location-rentals.jpg

426 ms

palisade-foundation-d63c3a92.jpg

palisade-foundation-d63c3a92.jpg

526 ms

southern-plantation-location-rental.jpg

southern-plantation-location-rental.jpg

354 ms

img_8043-1d9a9364-200x200.jpg

img_8043-1d9a9364-200x200.jpg

355 ms

400-7ef5fc30-200x200.jpg

400-7ef5fc30-200x200.jpg

449 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

192 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

216 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

46 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

189 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

315 ms

-nFnOHM81r4j6k0gjAW3mujVU2B2G_Bx1_rx52g.ttf

-nFnOHM81r4j6k0gjAW3mujVU2B2G_Bx1_rx52g.ttf

298 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

248 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

250 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

248 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

250 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

151 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

190 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

127 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

188 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

199 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

199 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

349 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

18 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

159 ms

Accessibility Review

filminglocationwanted.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

filminglocationwanted.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

filminglocationwanted.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filminglocationwanted.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filminglocationwanted.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filminglocationwanted.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filming Location Wanted. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: