Tools & Wizards About Us
filtcare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

filtcare.com

Filtcare: Industrial Filters Manufacturers and Suppliers India

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

793 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

524 ms

filtcare.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filtcare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filtcare.com

Filtcare is one of the leading manufacturer, exporter, and supplier of Self Cleaning Filter, Filter Housings, Filter Cartridge, Bag Filter Housings, Spun Bonded, Wound Filter Candles, Filter Cartridge...

Visit filtcare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filtcare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 793 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filtcare.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.791

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filtcare.com

793 ms

www.filtcare.com

1715 ms

gtm.js

58 ms

js

104 ms

fbevents.js

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Filtcare.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Filtcare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filtcare.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 72.1 kB

  • Original 80.2 kB
  • After minification 50.0 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.2 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filtcare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 615 B

  • Original 98.0 kB
  • After minification 98.0 kB
  • After compression 97.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 52.1 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtcare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (18%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtcare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filtcare.com

filtcare.com

793 ms

www.filtcare.com

www.filtcare.com

1715 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

58 ms

js

js

104 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

56 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

css

css

56 ms

libraries.css

libraries.css

525 ms

style.css

style.css

1004 ms

filtcare.png

filtcare.png

752 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

1000 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1258 ms

main.js

main.js

765 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2585 ms

Cartridge-Filter-Housing.jpg

Cartridge-Filter-Housing.jpg

1100 ms

Fabricated-Strainer.jpg

Fabricated-Strainer.jpg

1339 ms

Bag-Filter-Housing.jpg

Bag-Filter-Housing.jpg

1339 ms

Self-Cleaning-Filter.jpg

Self-Cleaning-Filter.jpg

1503 ms

PVC-Cartridge-Filter-Housing.jpg

PVC-Cartridge-Filter-Housing.jpg

1531 ms

PVC-Bag-Filter-Housing.jpg

PVC-Bag-Filter-Housing.jpg

1765 ms

Ystrainer-Tstrainer.jpg

Ystrainer-Tstrainer.jpg

1775 ms

Polypropylene-Filter-Housings.jpg

Polypropylene-Filter-Housings.jpg

1541 ms

Vent-Filter.jpg

Vent-Filter.jpg

2013 ms

Home-Banner.jpg

Home-Banner.jpg

2296 ms

Spun-Bonded-Cartridge.jpg

Spun-Bonded-Cartridge.jpg

2054 ms

Wound-Cartridge.jpg

Wound-Cartridge.jpg

2281 ms

Polypropylene-Pleated-Cartridge.jpg

Polypropylene-Pleated-Cartridge.jpg

2032 ms

PTFE-Pleated-Cartridge.jpg

PTFE-Pleated-Cartridge.jpg

2277 ms

Carbon-Cartridge.jpg

Carbon-Cartridge.jpg

2286 ms

Filter-Bags.jpg

Filter-Bags.jpg

2313 ms

Resin-Bonded-Cartridge.jpg

Resin-Bonded-Cartridge.jpg

2543 ms

StainessSteel-FilterCartridges.jpg

StainessSteel-FilterCartridges.jpg

2553 ms

Hydraulic-Lubeoil-Filter.jpg

Hydraulic-Lubeoil-Filter.jpg

2547 ms

Air-FilterBags.jpg

Air-FilterBags.jpg

3125 ms

Pocket-Filter.jpg

Pocket-Filter.jpg

2568 ms

Panel-Filter-Hepa-Filter.jpg

Panel-Filter-Hepa-Filter.jpg

2797 ms

Filter-Cage.jpg

Filter-Cage.jpg

2798 ms

GT-Air-Intake-Filters.jpg

GT-Air-Intake-Filters.jpg

2809 ms

Filtcare-Logo.png

Filtcare-Logo.png

2823 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

js

js

75 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

34 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

37 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG4S11zY.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG4S11zY.ttf

46 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG4S11zY.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG4S11zY.ttf

48 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHIS11zY.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHIS11zY.ttf

46 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHIS11zY.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHIS11zY.ttf

46 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

1740 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2044 ms

Accessibility Review

filtcare.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

filtcare.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

filtcare.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtcare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filtcare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filtcare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filtcare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: