Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

filterpixel.com

#1 AI Photo Culling & Editing Software for Windows & Mac | FilterPixel

Page Load Speed

11.2 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

8.5 sec

filterpixel.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filter Pixel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filterpixel.com

FilterPixel Photo Culling Software saves time by culling your photos automatically. Trusted by 5000+ photographers worldwide. Free 30 days trial available.

Visit filterpixel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filterpixel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filterpixel.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filterpixel.com

172 ms

l.js

49 ms

main.min.css

209 ms

module_155816649311_Top_Bar_Notification.min.css

240 ms

module_155358860669_Banner_-_Center-content-with-form.min.css

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Filterpixel.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Client.crisp.chat and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Filterpixel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (11%)

Content Size

14.1 MB

After Optimization

12.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Filterpixel.com main page is 14.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 70.1 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 13.7 MB
  • After minification 12.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filter Pixel needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 218.5 kB
  • After minification 218.5 kB
  • After compression 189.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 72.5 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 59.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filterpixel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (60%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filter Pixel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

filterpixel.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

filterpixel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

filterpixel.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filterpixel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filterpixel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filter Pixel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: