Tools & Wizards About Us
filterpress.ind.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

filterpress.ind.in

Sha Hydraulics Private Limited, Coimbatore - Manufacturer of Scissor Lifts and Filter Press

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

834 ms

filterpress.ind.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filter Press content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filterpress.ind.in

Manufacturer of Scissor Lifts, Filter Press & Lifting Equipment offered by Sha Hydraulics Private Limited from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Visit filterpress.ind.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Filterpress.ind.in page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filterpress.ind.in performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filterpress.ind.in

285 ms

www.filterpress.ind.in

247 ms

www.filterpress.ind.in

249 ms

css

34 ms

style_20_min.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Filterpress.ind.in, 25% (6 requests) were made to 5.imimg.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source 5.imimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

553.0 kB

After Optimization

464.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filterpress.ind.in main page is 553.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 409.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 56.0 kB

  • Original 77.1 kB
  • After minification 76.3 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 409.4 kB
  • After minification 377.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filter Press images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 58.5 kB
  • After minification 58.5 kB
  • After compression 58.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filterpress.ind.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filter Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filterpress.ind.in

filterpress.ind.in

285 ms

www.filterpress.ind.in

www.filterpress.ind.in

247 ms

www.filterpress.ind.in

www.filterpress.ind.in

249 ms

css

css

34 ms

style_20_min.css

style_20_min.css

21 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

17 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

27 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

36 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

37 ms

product-500x500.jpeg

product-500x500.jpeg

658 ms

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

680 ms

goods-elevator-500x500.jpg

goods-elevator-500x500.jpg

824 ms

sha-self-propelled-scissor-lift-500x500.jpg

sha-self-propelled-scissor-lift-500x500.jpg

635 ms

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

648 ms

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

829 ms

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

product-jpeg-500x500.jpg

638 ms

scissor-lift-battery-power-500x500.png

scissor-lift-battery-power-500x500.png

1045 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

25 ms

common_20_dyn_isq_37_min.js

common_20_dyn_isq_37_min.js

6 ms

ga.js

ga.js

19 ms

js

js

63 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

17 ms

Accessibility Review

filterpress.ind.in accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

filterpress.ind.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

filterpress.ind.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filterpress.ind.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filterpress.ind.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filterpress.ind.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filter Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: