Tools & Wizards About Us
filtersystemstechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

filtersystemstechnology.com

Industrial Filter & Filter Media Manufacturer | Leading Suppliers in India

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

496 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

197 ms

filtersystemstechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to filtersystemstechnology.com homepage info - get ready to check Filter Systemstechnology best content right away, or after learning these important things about filtersystemstechnology.com

FST - Filter System Technology is joint venture of leading Filter & Cartridge manufacturing company Filter Concept Pvt. Ltd. FST providing Distributorship at India level.

Visit filtersystemstechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filtersystemstechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 496 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filtersystemstechnology.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filtersystemstechnology.com

496 ms

filtersystemstechnology.com

1080 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

210 ms

style.min.css

418 ms

classic-themes.min.css

588 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Filtersystemstechnology.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Filtersystemstechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 531.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filtersystemstechnology.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 71.2 kB

  • Original 89.2 kB
  • After minification 82.5 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 443.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 943.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filter Systemstechnology needs image optimization as it can save up to 443.3 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 366.0 kB
  • After minification 366.0 kB
  • After compression 364.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 215.6 kB
  • After minification 215.6 kB
  • After compression 200.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtersystemstechnology.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (63%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filter Systemstechnology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filtersystemstechnology.com

filtersystemstechnology.com

496 ms

filtersystemstechnology.com

filtersystemstechnology.com

1080 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

210 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

418 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

588 ms

team.min.css

team.min.css

617 ms

styles.css

styles.css

625 ms

settings.css

settings.css

634 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1071 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

640 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

981 ms

style.css

style.css

1244 ms

css

css

31 ms

mpc-styles.css

mpc-styles.css

839 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1056 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

852 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1051 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1068 ms

head.min.js

head.min.js

1181 ms

css

css

45 ms

team.min.js

team.min.js

1341 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

1341 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1342 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

1720 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

1437 ms

etheme.min.js

etheme.min.js

1464 ms

mpc-vendor.min.js

mpc-vendor.min.js

1471 ms

mpc-scripts.min.js

mpc-scripts.min.js

1477 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1493 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

45 ms

filter-systems-technology-1.jpg

filter-systems-technology-1.jpg

203 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

1019 ms

slide2-2.jpg

slide2-2.jpg

722 ms

filter-systems-technology-logo.png

filter-systems-technology-logo.png

14 ms

Basket-Filter.jpg

Basket-Filter.jpg

544 ms

33.jpg

33.jpg

557 ms

111.png

111.png

1224 ms

font

font

83 ms

font

font

82 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

46 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

490 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

854 ms

filter-systems-technology-1.jpg

filter-systems-technology-1.jpg

573 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

340 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

456 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

515 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

553 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

660 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

213 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

199 ms

Accessibility Review

filtersystemstechnology.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

filtersystemstechnology.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

filtersystemstechnology.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtersystemstechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filtersystemstechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filtersystemstechnology.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filter Systemstechnology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: