8.7 sec in total
1.6 sec
6.3 sec
867 ms
Welcome to filtrakt.ru homepage info - get ready to check Filtrakt best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about filtrakt.ru
Строительный магазин "Филимлновский тракт" предлагает большой выбор строительных и отделочных материалов в Павловском Посаде, Электрогорске с доставкой по Москве и области.
Visit filtrakt.ruWe analyzed Filtrakt.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
filtrakt.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value25.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value15,740 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value28.1 s
0/100
10%
1578 ms
563 ms
154 ms
294 ms
484 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Filtrakt.ru, 2% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 2% (1 request) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Filtrakt.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 192.0 kB (22%)
855.3 kB
663.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Filtrakt.ru main page is 855.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 779.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filtrakt needs image optimization as it can save up to 128.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtrakt.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
43
43
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtrakt. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
filtrakt.ru
1578 ms
www.filtrakt.ru
563 ms
style.css
154 ms
lightbox.css
294 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
484 ms
lightbox.js
304 ms
fon-033.jpg
217 ms
top_01_2.jpg
590 ms
baner5.gif
3635 ms
top_k1_3.jpg
326 ms
top_k2_3.jpg
327 ms
top_k2_2.jpg
319 ms
top_k3.jpg
321 ms
index_02_2.jpg
727 ms
poisk-2.jpg
461 ms
fotom_75912.jpg
467 ms
cat_eltov.jpg
620 ms
cat_instrument.jpg
728 ms
cat_otdelochnie.jpg
740 ms
cat_smesi.jpg
714 ms
cat_kirpich.jpg
899 ms
cat_krovlya.jpg
842 ms
cat_krepezh.jpg
852 ms
cat_santehnika.jpg
836 ms
cat_pilomaterial.jpg
858 ms
cat_sad_ogorod.jpg
985 ms
cat_metalloprokat.jpg
1000 ms
cat_uteplitel.jpg
999 ms
cat_otoplemie.jpg
1004 ms
cat_dveri_rami.jpg
1158 ms
cat_kraska.jpg
1122 ms
fotom_4227.jpg
1140 ms
add_cart.gif
1139 ms
fotom_4177.jpg
1139 ms
fotom_79189.jpg
1278 ms
fotom_79340307.jpg
1300 ms
fotom_79247.jpg
1297 ms
l-kat-1.jpg
1201 ms
l-kat-2.jpg
1219 ms
l-kat-yel-1.jpg
1328 ms
niz_1.jpg
1340 ms
niz_c_1.jpg
1346 ms
watch.js
4 ms
hit
288 ms
niz_c_2.jpg
1276 ms
niz_c_3.jpg
1191 ms
niz_3.jpg
1307 ms
filtrakt.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
filtrakt.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
filtrakt.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtrakt.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filtrakt.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
filtrakt.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filtrakt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: