Tools & Wizards About Us
filtrestudio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

filtrestudio.com

Filtre Studio : : Artistic CGI | Retouch | Post-Production : : Chicago

Page Load Speed

618 ms in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

422 ms

Page Rendered

62 ms

filtrestudio.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filtre Studio content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filtrestudio.com

Filtre Studio is an award-winning production studio focused on creating inspired imagery through high-end retouching, compositing and CGI. Through a combination of artistic experience and technical ex...

Visit filtrestudio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filtrestudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 484 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filtrestudio.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.filtrestudio.com

134 ms

BwNqZvjEVSJJRb3Sba6h7GF8O8ejyh6MAtxoqxTea6XfeTtffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aZA4qZRFq5As8Fe4KFAIhjAbDwD9hFy7wMPG0Zc8CiY48SasuZe8zO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0jhNlOeZTdYskZWFXiAsTdkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCdeNRjAUGdaFXOYiaikoc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0jhNlOYiaikoc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicIKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifJsZe80OAFzdcs8d1F8ZfuaZAJ7fbRKHyMMeMw6MKG4fHvgIMMjgfMfH6qJy89bMs62JMJ7fbKgmsMgeMS6MKG4fVl9IMJjgfMfqMeP0zWLgb.js

46 ms

css2

63 ms

legacy.js

21 ms

modern.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Filtrestudio.com, 31% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 21% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (175 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filtrestudio.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 48.3 kB

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 107 B

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 30.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filtre Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 93 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 973 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtrestudio.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (67%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtre Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.filtrestudio.com

www.filtrestudio.com

134 ms

BwNqZvjEVSJJRb3Sba6h7GF8O8ejyh6MAtxoqxTea6XfeTtffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aZA4qZRFq5As8Fe4KFAIhjAbDwD9hFy7wMPG0Zc8CiY48SasuZe8zO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0jhNlOeZTdYskZWFXiAsTdkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCdeNRjAUGdaFXOYiaikoc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0jhNlOYiaikoc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicIKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifJsZe80OAFzdcs8d1F8ZfuaZAJ7fbRKHyMMeMw6MKG4fHvgIMMjgfMfH6qJy89bMs62JMJ7fbKgmsMgeMS6MKG4fVl9IMJjgfMfqMeP0zWLgb.js

BwNqZvjEVSJJRb3Sba6h7GF8O8ejyh6MAtxoqxTea6XfeTtffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aZA4qZRFq5As8Fe4KFAIhjAbDwD9hFy7wMPG0Zc8CiY48SasuZe8zO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0jhNlOeZTdYskZWFXiAsTdkoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCdeNRjAUGdaFXOYiaikoc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0jhNlOYiaikoc-AUXScmDiYmq-Av0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicIKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifJsZe80OAFzdcs8d1F8ZfuaZAJ7fbRKHyMMeMw6MKG4fHvgIMMjgfMfH6qJy89bMs62JMJ7fbKgmsMgeMS6MKG4fVl9IMJjgfMfqMeP0zWLgb.js

46 ms

css2

css2

63 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

21 ms

modern.js

modern.js

20 ms

extract-css-runtime-1b5a843f6ab72c57699c-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-1b5a843f6ab72c57699c-min.en-US.js

20 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

21 ms

cldr-resource-pack-e85130cf44bc2d365b8b-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-e85130cf44bc2d365b8b-min.en-US.js

20 ms

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-b03dd66b7c78e5e40bc7-min.en-US.js

22 ms

common-vendors-7598f4eb50a2ef12b555-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-7598f4eb50a2ef12b555-min.en-US.js

42 ms

common-e355b58b9255912494c5-min.en-US.js

common-e355b58b9255912494c5-min.en-US.js

41 ms

performance-eb022691e09e39c54c48-min.en-US.js

performance-eb022691e09e39c54c48-min.en-US.js

27 ms

site.css

site.css

59 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

js

js

175 ms

site-bundle.js

site-bundle.js

32 ms

jquery.twentytwenty_mx.js

jquery.twentytwenty_mx.js

10 ms

twentytwenty.css

twentytwenty.css

10 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

10 ms

filtre_logotag0719.png

filtre_logotag0719.png

81 ms

digital%2Bartists.logo%2B19-20sm.png

digital%2Bartists.logo%2B19-20sm.png

19 ms

filtre_logosm0719.png

filtre_logosm0719.png

23 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79P0U.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79P0U.ttf

28 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh4Ok.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh4Ok.ttf

34 ms

d

d

39 ms

d

d

43 ms

d

d

46 ms

d

d

45 ms

d

d

65 ms

Accessibility Review

filtrestudio.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

filtrestudio.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

filtrestudio.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtrestudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filtrestudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filtrestudio.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Filtre Studio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: