Tools & Wizards About Us
finecosmeticsurgery.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

finecosmeticsurgery.com

Account Suspended

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

98 ms

finecosmeticsurgery.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to finecosmeticsurgery.com homepage info - get ready to check Finecosmeticsurgery best content right away, or after learning these important things about finecosmeticsurgery.com

Visit finecosmeticsurgery.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Finecosmeticsurgery.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

finecosmeticsurgery.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value30.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

finecosmeticsurgery.com

2660 ms

style.min.css

1346 ms

dashicons.min.css

1124 ms

style.css

1359 ms

genericons.css

902 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Finecosmeticsurgery.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Finecosmeticsurgery.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (79%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

744.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Finecosmeticsurgery.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 128.3 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 156.7 kB
  • After compression 30.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Finecosmeticsurgery needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 892.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 343.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 892.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 346.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finecosmeticsurgery.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finecosmeticsurgery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

finecosmeticsurgery.com

finecosmeticsurgery.com

2660 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1346 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

1124 ms

style.css

style.css

1359 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

902 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1366 ms

be.css

be.css

1332 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1362 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

1567 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

1364 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1555 ms

vc_addons_kit.css

vc_addons_kit.css

2454 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1572 ms

all.css

all.css

171 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

2236 ms

style.css

style.css

1125 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

60 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1326 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1338 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

1783 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

2233 ms

css

css

29 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1337 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1347 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

1559 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1570 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1781 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

1899 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

1899 ms

menu.js

menu.js

1900 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

2003 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

2011 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

2013 ms

enllax.min.js

enllax.min.js

2019 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

2019 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2225 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

2232 ms

lib.js

lib.js

2454 ms

shortcode.js

shortcode.js

2234 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

2234 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

2003 ms

public.js

public.js

1990 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1991 ms

FineCosmetic-ThinLogo-1.png

FineCosmetic-ThinLogo-1.png

658 ms

FineCosmeticLogo.png

FineCosmeticLogo.png

658 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

659 ms

Hoefler-Text.woff

Hoefler-Text.woff

770 ms

ImprintMTShadow.woff

ImprintMTShadow.woff

778 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

768 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

19 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

24 ms

Accessibility Review

finecosmeticsurgery.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

finecosmeticsurgery.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

finecosmeticsurgery.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finecosmeticsurgery.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Finecosmeticsurgery.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

finecosmeticsurgery.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Finecosmeticsurgery. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: