Tools & Wizards About Us
finecreator.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

finecreator.com

Course Builder | FineCreator | Simple Web-based SCORM Authoring Tool

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

283 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

570 ms

finecreator.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to finecreator.com homepage info - get ready to check Fine Creator best content right away, or after learning these important things about finecreator.com

Create online SCORM courses with the easy course builder in your web browser. No coding required. Sign up today for a free trial.

Visit finecreator.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Finecreator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

finecreator.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

finecreator.com

283 ms

finecreator.com

512 ms

css2

37 ms

app.cac3e110.css

139 ms

landing-page.js

243 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Finecreator.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Finecreator.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (828 ms) relates to the external source Finecreator.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.0 kB (20%)

Content Size

578.9 kB

After Optimization

465.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Finecreator.com main page is 578.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 456.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 95.0 kB

  • Original 111.8 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.9 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 18.0 kB

  • Original 456.9 kB
  • After minification 438.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fine Creator images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 357 B
  • After minification 357 B
  • After compression 345 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 83 B

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finecreator.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fine Creator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

finecreator.com

finecreator.com

283 ms

finecreator.com

finecreator.com

512 ms

css2

css2

37 ms

app.cac3e110.css

app.cac3e110.css

139 ms

landing-page.js

landing-page.js

243 ms

js

js

79 ms

livewire.js

livewire.js

437 ms

js

js

125 ms

finecreator.jpg

finecreator.jpg

828 ms

gb.png

gb.png

189 ms

sk.png

sk.png

103 ms

logo-finecreator.png

logo-finecreator.png

190 ms

terno.png

terno.png

281 ms

winners.png

winners.png

282 ms

pyroconsulta.png

pyroconsulta.png

283 ms

afisp.png

afisp.png

282 ms

logo-foxario.png

logo-foxario.png

283 ms

logo-supervisor.png

logo-supervisor.png

296 ms

case-study.jpg

case-study.jpg

686 ms

zrf30HnU0_7wWdMrFcWqSEXPVyEaWJ55pTleMv9Duew.ttf

zrf30HnU0_7wWdMrFcWqSEXPVyEaWJ55pTleMv9Duew.ttf

93 ms

Accessibility Review

finecreator.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Best Practices

finecreator.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

finecreator.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finecreator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Finecreator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

finecreator.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fine Creator. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: