Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

fineshadings.com

Hunter Douglas Window Treatment | Fine Shadings & Decor

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

67 ms

Resources Loaded

955 ms

Page Rendered

910 ms

fineshadings.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fine Shadings content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fineshadings.com

Window Treatments and Window Coverings from Hunter Douglas at Fine Shadings & Decor near Miami and Greater Miami, Florida.

Visit fineshadings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fineshadings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fineshadings.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,490 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.881

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fineshadings.com

67 ms

www.fineshadings.com

148 ms

gtm.js

296 ms

launch-6a7c1cfced7e.min.js

189 ms

csrf.min.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Fineshadings.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (364 ms) relates to the external source Assets.hunterdouglas.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 571.9 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

768.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Fineshadings.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 716.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 421.6 kB

  • Original 460.8 kB
  • After minification 393.1 kB
  • After compression 39.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 67.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 421.6 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 41.3 kB

  • Original 716.6 kB
  • After minification 675.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fine Shadings images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 109.0 kB

  • Original 162.9 kB
  • After minification 162.9 kB
  • After compression 53.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fine Shadings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fineshadings.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

fineshadings.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fineshadings.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fineshadings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fineshadings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fine Shadings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: