Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

fingermark.co.nz

QSR Technology Solutions | Drive-Thru Timers | Fingermark

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

458 ms

fingermark.co.nz screenshot

About Website

Visit fingermark.co.nz now to see the best up-to-date Fingermark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fingermark.co.nz

Fingermark develops innovative technology and software solutions for the QSR industry to reach peak performance, including the world’s most advanced drive-thru timer.

Visit fingermark.co.nz

Key Findings

We analyzed Fingermark.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fingermark.co.nz performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.fingermark.tech

125 ms

gtm.js

111 ms

21287008.js

446 ms

shell.js

172 ms

polyfill-500edfc143d92a4594da.js

438 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Fingermark.co.nz, 29% (13 requests) were made to Fingermark.tech and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.sanity.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381.8 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

955.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Fingermark.co.nz main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 960.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 334.5 kB

  • Original 356.0 kB
  • After minification 355.9 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 334.5 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

  • Original 960.2 kB
  • After minification 912.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fingermark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (43%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fingermark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fingermark.co.nz accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fingermark.co.nz best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fingermark.co.nz SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fingermark.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fingermark.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fingermark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: