Tools & Wizards About Us
fip.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

fip.org

Home - FIP - International Pharmaceutical Federation Home

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

366 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

942 ms

fip.org screenshot

About Website

Visit fip.org now to see the best up-to-date FIP content for Netherlands and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fip.org

Home Home

Visit fip.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Fip.org page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fip.org performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fip.org

366 ms

www.fip.org

813 ms

css

35 ms

fontawesome.css

273 ms

brands.css

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Fip.org, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Fip.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (15%)

Content Size

9.9 MB

After Optimization

8.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fip.org main page is 9.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 69.9 kB

  • Original 82.1 kB
  • After minification 61.0 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 9.5 MB
  • After minification 8.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FIP needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 240.8 kB

  • Original 287.4 kB
  • After minification 260.3 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fip.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 240.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fip.org

fip.org

366 ms

www.fip.org

www.fip.org

813 ms

css

css

35 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

273 ms

brands.css

brands.css

350 ms

solid.css

solid.css

268 ms

v4-font-face.css

v4-font-face.css

277 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

60 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

543 ms

style.css

style.css

537 ms

new-mobile.css

new-mobile.css

390 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

384 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

464 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

526 ms

element.js

element.js

51 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

397 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

400 ms

js

js

40 ms

logo-google-translate.svg

logo-google-translate.svg

121 ms

logo-fip.svg

logo-fip.svg

98 ms

logo-fip.svg

logo-fip.svg

99 ms

Brisbane_Congress_3_FV.jpg

Brisbane_Congress_3_FV.jpg

458 ms

Brisbane_24.jpg

Brisbane_24.jpg

282 ms

52369048859_3b13df6714_o1.jpg

52369048859_3b13df6714_o1.jpg

285 ms

Paul_Sinclair_3_FV.jpg

Paul_Sinclair_3_FV.jpg

447 ms

Brisbane_Congress_8.jpg

Brisbane_Congress_8.jpg

975 ms

52364209468_c368759730_o1.jpg

52364209468_c368759730_o1.jpg

292 ms

Cape-Town-2024-4.jpg

Cape-Town-2024-4.jpg

384 ms

SAPS_home_banner.jpg

SAPS_home_banner.jpg

385 ms

2024-05_THTP_web_news_FV.png

2024-05_THTP_web_news_FV.png

393 ms

2024-03_Impact_database_web_news_2.JPG

2024-03_Impact_database_web_news_2.JPG

489 ms

Infographic_FV.png

Infographic_FV.png

1013 ms

footer-fip-building.jpg

footer-fip-building.jpg

490 ms

ribbon-pattern.png

ribbon-pattern.png

502 ms

www.fip.org

www.fip.org

679 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

552 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

566 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

598 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

651 ms

ribbon-pattern-medium.png

ribbon-pattern-medium.png

618 ms

js

js

50 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

Accessibility Review

fip.org accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

fip.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fip.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fip.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fip.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fip.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FIP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: