2.6 sec in total
215 ms
1.9 sec
495 ms
Welcome to fireteam.net homepage info - get ready to check Fireteam best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about fireteam.net
Visit fireteam.netWe analyzed Fireteam.net page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
fireteam.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.054
98/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
215 ms
260 ms
443 ms
171 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Fireteam.net, 18% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Fireteam.net.
Page size can be reduced by 302.9 kB (32%)
939.1 kB
636.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Fireteam.net main page is 939.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 527.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fireteam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 147.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fireteam.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (33%)
18
12
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fireteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fireteam.net
215 ms
www.fireteam.net
260 ms
www.fireteam.net
443 ms
global.min.css
171 ms
jquery.min.js
72 ms
bootstrap.min.js
73 ms
react.min.js
73 ms
lib.min.js
375 ms
global.min.js
375 ms
css
61 ms
hero_background_games.jpg
519 ms
carousel_gow.jpg
684 ms
clone_gray.svg
131 ms
clone_green.svg
347 ms
solar_system.png
531 ms
headshot_paul.png
526 ms
headshot_arnout.png
527 ms
headshot_armin.png
526 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
217 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
223 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
276 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
275 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
270 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
472 ms
fireteam.woff
478 ms
ga.js
130 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
chartbeat.js
56 ms
fireteam.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fireteam.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fireteam.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fireteam.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fireteam.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fireteam.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fireteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: