Tools & Wizards About Us
firewall.firm.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

firewall.firm.in

Managed Firewall Security Solutions Provider Company India

Page Load Speed

35.5 sec in total

First Response

3.9 sec

Resources Loaded

30.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

firewall.firm.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Firewall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about firewall.firm.in

Firewall, Network Firewall Security Company in India, Firewall Support, Firewall Monitoring, VPN, WAF – Website Firewall, Firewall Training Provider in India

Visit firewall.firm.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Firewall.firm.in page load time and found that the first response time was 3.9 sec and then it took 31.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

firewall.firm.in performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

firewall.firm.in

3855 ms

adsbygoogle.js

168 ms

style.min.css

689 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

449 ms

woocommerce.css

453 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Firewall.firm.in, 2% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Partnerportal.sophos.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 757.1 kB (12%)

Content Size

6.5 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Firewall.firm.in main page is 6.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 396.4 kB

  • Original 444.9 kB
  • After minification 430.6 kB
  • After compression 48.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 396.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 320.3 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Firewall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 578.1 kB
  • After minification 578.1 kB
  • After compression 543.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 66.3 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 60.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Firewall.firm.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (22%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

84

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Firewall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

3855 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

168 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

689 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

449 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

453 ms

style.css

style.css

689 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

461 ms

css

css

22 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

672 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

676 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

699 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

895 ms

w.js

w.js

15 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1129 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

906 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

915 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

921 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

1117 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

1186 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

310 ms

g.gif

g.gif

4 ms

background.png

background.png

1443 ms

top-shadow.png

top-shadow.png

309 ms

firewall_firm_logo_small-1.png

firewall_firm_logo_small-1.png

1192 ms

tiefontello.svg

tiefontello.svg

283 ms

tiefontello.woff

tiefontello.woff

283 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

8 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

12 ms

black-loader.gif

black-loader.gif

252 ms

Server_Security_Management.png

Server_Security_Management.png

1732 ms

Firewall_Banner.jpg

Firewall_Banner.jpg

1390 ms

security-operations-center-soc-india.jpg

security-operations-center-soc-india.jpg

1497 ms

Managed-Firewall-Support-Services.jpg

Managed-Firewall-Support-Services.jpg

1902 ms

sidebar-bullet.png

sidebar-bullet.png

256 ms

Juniper_Firewall.png

Juniper_Firewall.png

1909 ms

Cisco-Firewall.png

Cisco-Firewall.png

1705 ms

Checkpoint_Firewall.png

Checkpoint_Firewall.png

2000 ms

Paloalto_Firewall.png

Paloalto_Firewall.png

2334 ms

FortiGate-Firewall.png

FortiGate-Firewall.png

2116 ms

Forcepoint-Firewall.png

Forcepoint-Firewall.png

2137 ms

Sophos-Firewall.png

Sophos-Firewall.png

2325 ms

WatchGuard_Firebox_Firewall.png

WatchGuard_Firebox_Firewall.png

2371 ms

Barracuda-Firewall.png

Barracuda-Firewall.png

2225 ms

Sonicwall-Firewall.png

Sonicwall-Firewall.png

2350 ms

Gajshield-Firewall.png

Gajshield-Firewall.png

2370 ms

Seqrite-Firewall.jpg

Seqrite-Firewall.jpg

2446 ms

Juniper_SRX_300_Firewall.png

Juniper_SRX_300_Firewall.png

2556 ms

Cisco_1010_Firepower_Firewall.png

Cisco_1010_Firepower_Firewall.png

2564 ms

Check_Point_1500_Firewall.png

Check_Point_1500_Firewall.png

2575 ms

Palo_Alto_PA_220_Firewall.png

Palo_Alto_PA_220_Firewall.png

2598 ms

FortiGate_40F_Firewall.png

FortiGate_40F_Firewall.png

2608 ms

Forcepoint_60_Firewall.png

Forcepoint_60_Firewall.png

2667 ms

Sophos-XGS-87-Firewall.png

Sophos-XGS-87-Firewall.png

2784 ms

WatchGuard-Firebox-T20-Firewall.png

WatchGuard-Firebox-T20-Firewall.png

2798 ms

Barracuda_F12_Firewall.png

Barracuda_F12_Firewall.png

2799 ms

SonicWall_TZ_270_Firewall.png

SonicWall_TZ_270_Firewall.png

2821 ms

GS15nu_V2_Firewall.png

GS15nu_V2_Firewall.png

2846 ms

Seqrite-T2S-30-Firewall.jpg

Seqrite-T2S-30-Firewall.jpg

2886 ms

Cyber-Security-Audit-Services-in-Delhi-India.png

Cyber-Security-Audit-Services-in-Delhi-India.png

3241 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

136 ms

ads

ads

107 ms

How_Hackers_Hack_How_to_Stop_them-70x70.jpg

How_Hackers_Hack_How_to_Stop_them-70x70.jpg

2885 ms

pfSense_Firewall-300x160.png

pfSense_Firewall-300x160.png

2882 ms

micro-vertical.aspx

micro-vertical.aspx

20109 ms

fortinet-security-products.png

fortinet-security-products.png

2891 ms

Managed-Firewall-Support-Services.png

Managed-Firewall-Support-Services.png

2859 ms

api.js

api.js

61 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

244 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

334 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

261 ms

tie-scripts.js

tie-scripts.js

232 ms

Sophos_Silver_Partner.jpg

Sophos_Silver_Partner.jpg

2257 ms

ccna.jpeg

ccna.jpeg

2208 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

206 ms

ccie.png

ccie.png

2199 ms

CCSE.png

CCSE.png

1887 ms

ccsa.gif

ccsa.gif

1830 ms

ceh-logo_jpg.jpg

ceh-logo_jpg.jpg

1619 ms

jncis.png

jncis.png

1736 ms

PCNSE.jpg

PCNSE.jpg

1591 ms

Xg.png

Xg.png

1791 ms

WhatsApp-Channel.JPG

WhatsApp-Channel.JPG

1487 ms

cynet.png

cynet.png

19699 ms

95-is-human-error-300x160.jpg

95-is-human-error-300x160.jpg

13097 ms

Security_monitoring.jpeg

Security_monitoring.jpeg

13757 ms

pfSense_Firewall.png

pfSense_Firewall.png

13958 ms

Untangle-Firewall.png

Untangle-Firewall.png

14176 ms

Endian-Firewall.png

Endian-Firewall.png

14432 ms

Smoothwal_Firewall.png

Smoothwal_Firewall.png

14230 ms

OPNsense-Firewall.png

OPNsense-Firewall.png

14662 ms

VyOS-Firewall.png

VyOS-Firewall.png

14746 ms

ClearOS-Firewall.png

ClearOS-Firewall.png

14867 ms

IPFire-Firewall.png

IPFire-Firewall.png

15149 ms

JuniperNetworks.png

JuniperNetworks.png

15025 ms

Cisco_Firewall-1.png

Cisco_Firewall-1.png

15114 ms

Checkpoint_Firewall.png

Checkpoint_Firewall.png

15360 ms

paloalto_Firewall.png

paloalto_Firewall.png

15168 ms

Fortinet_Firewall.png

Fortinet_Firewall.png

15272 ms

Forcepoint_Firewall.png

Forcepoint_Firewall.png

15337 ms

Sophosl_Firewall.png

Sophosl_Firewall.png

15336 ms

WatchGuard_Firewall.png

WatchGuard_Firewall.png

15358 ms

Barracuda_Firewall.png

Barracuda_Firewall.png

15419 ms

SonicWall_Firewall.png

SonicWall_Firewall.png

15530 ms

Gajshield_Firewall.png

Gajshield_Firewall.png

15504 ms

Seqrite_Firewall.png

Seqrite_Firewall.png

15565 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

13798 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

12214 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

11059 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

9787 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

10384 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

9739 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

8551 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

7080 ms

firewall.firm.in

firewall.firm.in

5071 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

227 ms

Accessibility Review

firewall.firm.in accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

firewall.firm.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

firewall.firm.in SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Firewall.firm.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Firewall.firm.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

firewall.firm.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Firewall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: