Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

fiskl.com

Fiskl - The modern AI-automated global accounting

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

584 ms

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

fiskl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fiskl content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fiskl.com

AI-powered multi-currency accounting plus invoicing, payments, automated sync with 21k banks worldwide, tax tracking and more.

Visit fiskl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fiskl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 584 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fiskl.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,550 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.103

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value47.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fiskl.com

584 ms

new-styles.css

412 ms

styles.css

224 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

225 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

368 ms

Our browser made a total of 186 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Fiskl.com, 24% (45 requests) were made to Cdn.loom.com and 17% (31 requests) were made to Cdn-aplgo.nitrocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Fiskl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.0 MB (41%)

Content Size

14.8 MB

After Optimization

8.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Fiskl.com main page is 14.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 331.5 kB

  • Original 415.9 kB
  • After minification 415.3 kB
  • After compression 84.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 331.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 298.3 kB

  • Original 7.3 MB
  • After minification 7.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fiskl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 3.6 MB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB
  • After compression 1.6 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.6 MB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 184.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fiskl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 96 (53%)

Requests Now

180

After Optimization

84

The browser has sent 180 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fiskl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 77 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fiskl.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

fiskl.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

fiskl.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fiskl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fiskl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fiskl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: