Tools & Wizards About Us
fitzport.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

fitzport.com

FitzPort.com: Your Partner in Transformation

Page Load Speed

13 sec in total

First Response

577 ms

Resources Loaded

12.2 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

fitzport.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fitzport.com now to see the best up-to-date Fitz Port content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fitzport.com

FitzPort.com is your all-in-one fitness solution. We are your personal trainer, nutritionist, supplement expert, and support group. We provide the technology, tools, and products you need to burn fat,...

Visit fitzport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fitzport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 577 ms and then it took 12.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fitzport.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fitzport.com

577 ms

fitzport.com

1714 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-f0d1477d16e8227e91df10d30f3a2e29.css

2227 ms

all.css

162 ms

jquery.min.js

571 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Fitzport.com, 27% (17 requests) were made to Media.fitzport.com and 16% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Fitzport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (29%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fitzport.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 166.4 kB

  • Original 216.8 kB
  • After minification 213.4 kB
  • After compression 50.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 407.2 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fitz Port needs image optimization as it can save up to 407.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 342.0 kB

  • Original 685.9 kB
  • After minification 685.9 kB
  • After compression 344.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.0 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 122.7 kB

  • Original 452.1 kB
  • After minification 452.1 kB
  • After compression 329.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fitzport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.7 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fitz Port. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fitzport.com

fitzport.com

577 ms

fitzport.com

fitzport.com

1714 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-f0d1477d16e8227e91df10d30f3a2e29.css

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-f0d1477d16e8227e91df10d30f3a2e29.css

2227 ms

all.css

all.css

162 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

571 ms

api.js

api.js

50 ms

js

js

82 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

84 ms

element.js

element.js

71 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1407 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

854 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

858 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

1157 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

876 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

1138 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-js-0ebce15ec186f6e67187ca85fae780e9.js

siteground-optimizer-combined-js-0ebce15ec186f6e67187ca85fae780e9.js

2124 ms

workoutplan-gender-female.png

workoutplan-gender-female.png

1486 ms

logo.png

logo.png

401 ms

footer-logo-210x46.png

footer-logo-210x46.png

400 ms

workoutplan-gender-male.png

workoutplan-gender-male.png

1494 ms

workoutplan-goal-female-build-muscle.png

workoutplan-goal-female-build-muscle.png

1512 ms

workoutplan-goal-female-lose-fat.png

workoutplan-goal-female-lose-fat.png

1514 ms

workoutplan-goal-female-transform.png

workoutplan-goal-female-transform.png

1575 ms

workoutplan-goal-male-build-muscle.png

workoutplan-goal-male-build-muscle.png

1726 ms

workoutplan-goal-male-lose-fat.png

workoutplan-goal-male-lose-fat.png

2022 ms

workoutplan-goal-male-transform.png

workoutplan-goal-male-transform.png

2062 ms

arnolds-workoutplan.png

arnolds-workoutplan.png

2927 ms

john-gaines-mass-building-program-fitzport.com.png

john-gaines-mass-building-program-fitzport.com.png

2932 ms

davey-fisher-cutting-program-fitzport.com.png

davey-fisher-cutting-program-fitzport.com.png

3009 ms

guru-manns-6-week-to-shredded.png

guru-manns-6-week-to-shredded.png

3218 ms

fitness-calculator-icon-body-mass-index.png

fitness-calculator-icon-body-mass-index.png

2302 ms

fitness-calculator-icon-body-fat-index.png

fitness-calculator-icon-body-fat-index.png

2346 ms

fitness-calculator-icon-calories-burned.png

fitness-calculator-icon-calories-burned.png

2583 ms

fitness-calculator-icon-caloric-intake.png

fitness-calculator-icon-caloric-intake.png

2633 ms

fitness-calculator-icon-one-rep-max.png

fitness-calculator-icon-one-rep-max.png

2864 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

212 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

295 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

152 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

198 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

201 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

329 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

346 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

345 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

327 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

344 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

890 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

390 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

342 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

611 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

390 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

889 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

452 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

346 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf

346 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

344 ms

MwQrbgD32-KAvjkYGNUUxAtW7pEBwx-tS1Za.ttf

MwQrbgD32-KAvjkYGNUUxAtW7pEBwx-tS1Za.ttf

344 ms

va9b4kzIxd1KFppkaRKvDRPJVDf_FRjekGrW.ttf

va9b4kzIxd1KFppkaRKvDRPJVDf_FRjekGrW.ttf

346 ms

fitzport.com

fitzport.com

7724 ms

Easy-Login.ttf

Easy-Login.ttf

614 ms

logo.png

logo.png

538 ms

ads

ads

562 ms

flags18.png

flags18.png

865 ms

default-skin.png

default-skin.png

605 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

64 ms

Accessibility Review

fitzport.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fitzport.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fitzport.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fitzport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fitzport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fitzport.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fitz Port. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: