Tools & Wizards About Us
fjfield.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

fjfield.com

エフジェイフィールド(fjfield) | 中古トレーニングマシン | 介護予防 トレーニングマシン中古 | トレーニング機器 | 販売・買取 | 京都市 |

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

882 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

110 ms

fjfield.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fjfield.com now to see the best up-to-date Fjfield content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fjfield.com

トレーニングマシン中古・新古は エフジェイフィールド(fjfield)へ。信用のブランドマシンのみ取扱い。入荷台数日本最大級でお探しの中古トレーニングマシンが見つかります。Gym新店納入実績も数多く、15年以上の実績で、新品に引けを取らないクオリティと保守サービスで安心の取引をしていただけます。

Visit fjfield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fjfield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 882 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fjfield.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,070 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fjfield.com

882 ms

top1.jpg

943 ms

top2.jpg

824 ms

topcom.jpg

666 ms

toplef1.jpg

756 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Fjfield.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Fjfield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.9 kB (17%)

Content Size

567.1 kB

After Optimization

471.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Fjfield.com main page is 567.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 545.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 78.3 kB

  • Original 545.9 kB
  • After minification 467.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fjfield needs image optimization as it can save up to 78.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

30

  • Images

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fjfield. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

fjfield.com

fjfield.com

882 ms

top1.jpg

top1.jpg

943 ms

top2.jpg

top2.jpg

824 ms

topcom.jpg

topcom.jpg

666 ms

toplef1.jpg

toplef1.jpg

756 ms

topsen.jpg

topsen.jpg

865 ms

toplef2.jpg

toplef2.jpg

885 ms

koeber.jpg

koeber.jpg

1359 ms

menteber.jpg

menteber.jpg

1053 ms

w.jpg

w.jpg

1231 ms

toptopi.jpg

toptopi.jpg

1256 ms

top2namemae.jpg

top2namemae.jpg

1236 ms

c-regp3.jpg

c-regp3.jpg

1680 ms

ts-pl3.jpg

ts-pl3.jpg

1989 ms

hmshrug2.jpg

hmshrug2.jpg

2103 ms

c-step4.jpg

c-step4.jpg

2095 ms

teselrota1.jpg

teselrota1.jpg

2284 ms

m33.jpg

m33.jpg

2222 ms

huslatop.jpg

huslatop.jpg

2763 ms

mastop.jpg

mastop.jpg

2803 ms

rejisutannsu.jpg

rejisutannsu.jpg

2802 ms

aztop.jpg

aztop.jpg

2899 ms

alerog.jpg

alerog.jpg

3146 ms

caseber.jpg

caseber.jpg

2846 ms

jireigako.jpg

jireigako.jpg

3576 ms

topsekkotu.jpg

topsekkotu.jpg

3554 ms

jirei1008.jpg

jirei1008.jpg

3826 ms

jirei4-1.jpg

jirei4-1.jpg

3597 ms

minato.jpg

minato.jpg

3893 ms

jimu.jpg

jimu.jpg

3842 ms

topsaikai.jpg

topsaikai.jpg

4478 ms

Accessibility Review

fjfield.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fjfield.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fjfield.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fjfield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fjfield.com main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

fjfield.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fjfield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: