8.3 sec in total
2.4 sec
5.6 sec
297 ms
Visit fliesser.de now to see the best up-to-date Fliesser content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fliesser.de
Fliesser has been active as a customised flexible hoses for sanitary and plumbing applications manufacturer for more than 5 years.
Visit fliesser.deWe analyzed Fliesser.de page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
fliesser.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.3 s
0/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.604
10/100
15%
Value17.9 s
4/100
10%
2395 ms
125 ms
228 ms
22 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Fliesser.de, 11% (10 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fliesser.de.
Page size can be reduced by 412.6 kB (3%)
14.4 MB
14.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Fliesser.de main page is 14.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 355.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fliesser images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fliesser.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (69%)
77
24
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fliesser. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2395 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
125 ms
layerslider.css
228 ms
css
22 ms
styles.css
227 ms
settings.css
244 ms
wordpress-svg-icon-plugin-style.min.css
246 ms
style.css
358 ms
adaptive.css
257 ms
retina.css
343 ms
fontello.css
345 ms
fontello-custom.css
369 ms
animate.css
372 ms
cmsmasters-woo-style.css
384 ms
cmsmasters-woo-adaptive.css
460 ms
cmsmasters-events-style.css
463 ms
cmsmasters-events-adaptive.css
480 ms
ilightbox.css
494 ms
dark-skin.css
498 ms
all-business.css
744 ms
css
20 ms
ytprefs.min.css
578 ms
greensock.js
688 ms
jquery.js
605 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
620 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
800 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
696 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
735 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
827 ms
jsLibraries.min.js
829 ms
jquery.iLightBox.min.js
922 ms
ytprefs.min.js
861 ms
style.css
863 ms
jquery.megaMenu.js
871 ms
scripts.js
871 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
948 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1007 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1008 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1008 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
890 ms
jqueryLibraries.min.js
821 ms
jquery.script.js
818 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
903 ms
jquery.cmsmasters-woo-script.js
901 ms
comment-reply.min.js
892 ms
fitvids.min.js
806 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1004 ms
Logo_195px.png
412 ms
Logo_390.png
450 ms
Slider_1.jpg
1040 ms
line__.png
450 ms
Slider_2.jpg
1058 ms
Slider_3.jpg
1033 ms
IMG_4367_DN6.jpg
819 ms
IMG_4344_DN8.jpg
818 ms
IMG_4530_washing_m_.jpg
1044 ms
Production_6a-01.jpg
1047 ms
Production_6a-02.jpg
1050 ms
Production_6a-03.jpg
1158 ms
Production_6a-04.jpg
1171 ms
Production_6a_05.jpg
1295 ms
Production_6a_06.jpg
1181 ms
Production_6a_07.jpg
1190 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
11 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
43 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
44 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
44 ms
xKZQ6AlVQrk
141 ms
www-player.css
8 ms
www-embed-player.js
22 ms
base.js
48 ms
id
134 ms
ad_status.js
129 ms
Create
107 ms
qoe
85 ms
s9i9Iyk4Y_s1LD6aqz2X9kjqPppJUVpoTsMZDucYENo.js
81 ms
embed.js
59 ms
skin.css
774 ms
xKZQ6AlVQrk
137 ms
iframe_api
32 ms
www-widgetapi.js
3 ms
ad_status.js
93 ms
s9i9Iyk4Y_s1LD6aqz2X9kjqPppJUVpoTsMZDucYENo.js
35 ms
embed.js
12 ms
Create
120 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
96 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
196 ms
id
91 ms
GenerateIT
16 ms
skin.png
124 ms
fliesser.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fliesser.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
fliesser.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fliesser.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fliesser.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fliesser.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fliesser. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: