2.1 sec in total
202 ms
1.3 sec
628 ms
Click here to check amazing Flightfox content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flightfox.com
Fly better for less by working with genuine travel experts.
Visit flightfox.comWe analyzed Flightfox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
flightfox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value490 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
202 ms
103 ms
188 ms
22 ms
417 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Flightfox.com, 35% (9 requests) were made to Flightfox.s3.amazonaws.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (940 ms) belongs to the original domain Flightfox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 78.2 kB (7%)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Flightfox.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flightfox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightfox.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
21
21
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flightfox. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
flightfox.com
202 ms
content.css
103 ms
home.js
188 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
tom.jpg
417 ms
bg-upper.jpg
940 ms
logo-light.svg
174 ms
bg-lower.jpg
239 ms
logo-nyt.svg
186 ms
logo-bbc.svg
202 ms
logo-bt.svg
206 ms
logo-cbs.svg
266 ms
logo-lh.svg
284 ms
alex.jpg
405 ms
lucas.jpg
405 ms
jens.jpg
408 ms
woj.jpg
457 ms
jorge.jpg
406 ms
crystal.jpg
469 ms
matt.jpg
509 ms
dave.jpg
494 ms
collect
42 ms
roboto-regular.woff
303 ms
roboto-medium.woff
340 ms
opensans-semibold.woff
249 ms
flightfox.woff
364 ms
flightfox.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
flightfox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
flightfox.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightfox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flightfox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flightfox.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Flightfox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: