Tools & Wizards About Us
flightoptions.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

flightoptions.com

Flexjet | Private Jet Company | Aircraft Ownership | Leasing

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

890 ms

Page Rendered

161 ms

flightoptions.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Flightoptions content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flightoptions.com

Flexjet is a leading luxury private jet company offering aviation services including fractional jet ownership, leasing, jet cards, and our Red Label program.

Visit flightoptions.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Flightoptions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flightoptions.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.5

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flightoptions.com

285 ms

widgetkit-7a19e191.css

38 ms

mootools-core.js

72 ms

core.js

48 ms

caption.js

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Flightoptions.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) belongs to the original domain Flightoptions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 172.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flightoptions.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 902.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 24.5 kB
  • After minification 23.3 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 60.2 kB

  • Original 902.0 kB
  • After minification 841.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flightoptions images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 83.3 kB

  • Original 311.4 kB
  • After minification 310.2 kB
  • After compression 228.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.3 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 37.1 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightoptions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (64%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flightoptions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

flightoptions.com

flightoptions.com

285 ms

widgetkit-7a19e191.css

widgetkit-7a19e191.css

38 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

72 ms

core.js

core.js

48 ms

caption.js

caption.js

47 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

88 ms

widgetkit-60b8b524.js

widgetkit-60b8b524.js

50 ms

base.css

base.css

62 ms

layout.css

layout.css

70 ms

menus.css

menus.css

86 ms

modules.css

modules.css

87 ms

tools.css

tools.css

101 ms

system.css

system.css

103 ms

extensions.css

extensions.css

101 ms

custom.css

custom.css

103 ms

arial.css

arial.css

103 ms

arial.css

arial.css

104 ms

style.css

style.css

108 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

114 ms

print.css

print.css

115 ms

warp.js

warp.js

116 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

121 ms

accordionmenu.js

accordionmenu.js

119 ms

dropdownmenu.js

dropdownmenu.js

130 ms

template.js

template.js

136 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

97 ms

oct.js

oct.js

17 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

43 ms

base.css

base.css

45 ms

css

css

22 ms

layout.css

layout.css

46 ms

menus.css

menus.css

48 ms

modules.css

modules.css

57 ms

tools.css

tools.css

61 ms

system.css

system.css

62 ms

system.css

system.css

63 ms

system-all.css

system-all.css

67 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

56 ms

print.css

print.css

63 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

95 ms

ga.js

ga.js

58 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

73 ms

,

,

27 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

52 ms

logo.png

logo.png

32 ms

home4.png

home4.png

156 ms

nav.png

nav.png

34 ms

square-fractional.png

square-fractional.png

32 ms

square-lease.png

square-lease.png

31 ms

square-jetpass.png

square-jetpass.png

53 ms

400xt-icon.png

400xt-icon.png

58 ms

citationx-icon.png

citationx-icon.png

58 ms

legacy600-icon.png

legacy600-icon.png

58 ms

totop_scroller.png

totop_scroller.png

59 ms

menu_line_item.png

menu_line_item.png

78 ms

icon-facebook.png

icon-facebook.png

81 ms

icon-twitter.png

icon-twitter.png

82 ms

icon-linkedin.png

icon-linkedin.png

81 ms

icon-youtube.png

icon-youtube.png

82 ms

icon-pinterest.png

icon-pinterest.png

110 ms

icon-googleplus.png

icon-googleplus.png

111 ms

icon-instagram.png

icon-instagram.png

111 ms

Apple-Appstore-logo.png

Apple-Appstore-logo.png

111 ms

Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFrOF6lw.ttf

Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFrOF6lw.ttf

16 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

73 ms

adsct

adsct

114 ms

adsct

adsct

95 ms

home3.png

home3.png

141 ms

home1.png

home1.png

183 ms

home-argus.png

home-argus.png

181 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

10 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

4 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

159 ms

js

js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

flightoptions.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

flightoptions.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

flightoptions.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightoptions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flightoptions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

flightoptions.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Flightoptions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: