3.4 sec in total
245 ms
2.7 sec
503 ms
Welcome to flirtlife.de homepage info - get ready to check Flirtlife best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about flirtlife.de
Visit flirtlife.deWe analyzed Flirtlife.de page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
flirtlife.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value940 ms
30/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
245 ms
24 ms
95 ms
205 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (107 requests) were addressed to the original Flirtlife.de, 8% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Flirtlife.de.
Page size can be reduced by 155.4 kB (41%)
376.6 kB
221.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Flirtlife.de main page is 376.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 195.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flirtlife needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 119.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flirtlife.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (49%)
126
64
The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flirtlife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.flirtlife.de
245 ms
ga.js
24 ms
frame_o_links.php
95 ms
frame_o_mitte.php
205 ms
frame_o_rechts.php
192 ms
frame_l_mitte.php
202 ms
startseite.php
416 ms
frame_r_mitte.php
196 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
styles_main.css
8 ms
flirt_01_250.gif
6 ms
fl-logo-de.gif
10 ms
flirt_03.gif
34 ms
user_online.php
108 ms
flirt_22.jpg
14 ms
flirt_06.gif
13 ms
prototype.lite.js
12 ms
application.js
12 ms
application.js
14 ms
fl_ticker.php
108 ms
flirt_02.gif
8 ms
menu_json.php
111 ms
flirt_08.jpg
5 ms
menu_top.gif
6 ms
menu_middle.gif
6 ms
menu_headbg.gif
7 ms
approved_mini.gif
11 ms
favoriten_small.gif
12 ms
coins_small.gif
39 ms
menu_bottom.gif
14 ms
mf_off.gif
7 ms
m_off.gif
6 ms
f_off.gif
4 ms
pic_off.gif
8 ms
buddy_on.gif
7 ms
search_off.gif
11 ms
name.gif
12 ms
alter.gif
18 ms
ticker.js
20 ms
075ce.jpg
218 ms
c7c82.jpg
214 ms
js
165 ms
gplus-64.png
29 ms
4c89b.jpg
9 ms
m.gif
12 ms
2a9d2.jpg
11 ms
86f05.jpg
198 ms
bild.gif
12 ms
twitter4.png
12 ms
md5.js
11 ms
teaser.gif
22 ms
prem_small.gif
22 ms
baef3.jpg
217 ms
8ed0c.jpg
29 ms
731bf.jpg
121 ms
dot.gif
21 ms
blue.gif
22 ms
rss.gif
21 ms
library-1.47.3.js
23 ms
amzn_ads.js
36 ms
bid
87 ms
bg_gr.jpg
7 ms
login_spy.php
99 ms
likebox.php
173 ms
action_out.php
117 ms
bullet_pfeil.gif
15 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
jquery.js
10 ms
spy.js
4 ms
2e509.jpg
194 ms
7e3ce.jpg
193 ms
afba4.jpg
183 ms
e1907.jpg
201 ms
0e1ad.jpg
20 ms
4bcf2.jpg
195 ms
adf2b.jpg
190 ms
no_photo_small.gif
13 ms
6464c.jpg
364 ms
7a05d.jpg
374 ms
05db6.jpg
372 ms
39b68.jpg
466 ms
5740b.jpg
380 ms
6f4c8.jpg
385 ms
43476.jpg
550 ms
a00ad.jpg
562 ms
b338d.jpg
841 ms
3b9c0.jpg
571 ms
7e772.jpg
576 ms
32caa.jpg
676 ms
53dcc.jpg
641 ms
61c42.jpg
749 ms
5e4c8.jpg
754 ms
6fe20.jpg
757 ms
87ac8.jpg
834 ms
9dc48.jpg
1142 ms
4c3a1.jpg
945 ms
7dc47.jpg
759 ms
65e13.jpg
761 ms
1aa0e.jpg
951 ms
439d5.jpg
948 ms
867b2.jpg
1024 ms
8d5b1.jpg
1020 ms
7da83.jpg
1137 ms
dd028.jpg
1047 ms
83fa0.jpg
1141 ms
28f61.jpg
1194 ms
1a661.jpg
1211 ms
roNeOY-tz5Y.css
21 ms
UHhaxo8Cs3k.css
23 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
32 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
45 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
30 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
43 ms
61103_447467953087_2392552_n.jpg
26 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
3 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
3 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
3 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
4 ms
bfa53.jpg
881 ms
pm.gif
5 ms
1d1e1.jpg
1059 ms
d9cd4.jpg
958 ms
51e1c.jpg
959 ms
5e00e.jpg
965 ms
4fa0c.jpg
962 ms
3e6ac.jpg
794 ms
d51fb.jpg
787 ms
flirtlife.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
flirtlife.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
flirtlife.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flirtlife.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flirtlife.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
flirtlife.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flirtlife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: