Tools & Wizards About Us
flirttape.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

flirttape.com

优游登陆注册-ub8优游注册平台-优游台湾宾果5分

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

592 ms

flirttape.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Flirttape content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flirttape.com

ニキビ跡消す方法！男性に人気の化粧水はここから

Visit flirttape.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Flirttape.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flirttape.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

flirttape.com

1004 ms

jquery.min.js

35 ms

config.js

375 ms

styles.css

1094 ms

textstyles.css

561 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Flirttape.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Analyze.pro.research-artisan.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Www24.a8.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.3 kB (52%)

Content Size

193.4 kB

After Optimization

92.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flirttape.com main page is 193.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 100.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 16.4 kB
  • After minification 16.3 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 70.6 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flirttape images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 156 B

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 86.6 kB

  • Original 100.0 kB
  • After minification 80.0 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flirttape.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (57%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flirttape. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

flirttape.com

flirttape.com

1004 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

config.js

config.js

375 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1094 ms

textstyles.css

textstyles.css

561 ms

522 ms

bgt

bgt

1174 ms

0.gif

0.gif

304 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

756 ms

reproskin.gif

reproskin.gif

675 ms

tables.css

tables.css

376 ms

commonstyles.css

commonstyles.css

404 ms

top_bg.png

top_bg.png

193 ms

contents_bg.gif

contents_bg.gif

193 ms

h3.gif

h3.gif

189 ms

pagetop_button.png

pagetop_button.png

167 ms

menu_h4_bg.gif

menu_h4_bg.gif

332 ms

menu_h4.png

menu_h4.png

348 ms

footer_bg.gif

footer_bg.gif

369 ms

footer_inner_bg.gif

footer_inner_bg.gif

371 ms

script.php

script.php

145 ms

tracker.php

tracker.php

161 ms

SEO Factors

flirttape.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flirttape.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Flirttape.com main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

flirttape.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flirttape. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: