Tools & Wizards About Us
floatingpowerplant.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

floatingpowerplant.com

Floating Power Plant - Invest in the future of energy

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

4.9 sec

floatingpowerplant.com screenshot

About Website

Visit floatingpowerplant.com now to see the best up-to-date Floating Power Plant content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about floatingpowerplant.com

Join renewable energy pioneer FPP to impact climate change. Floating Power Plant is a unique, patented technology harvesting the limitless wind and wave energy of the ocean. Be part of the future now

Visit floatingpowerplant.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Floatingpowerplant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

floatingpowerplant.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,440 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

floatingpowerplant.com

272 ms

floatingpowerplant.com

794 ms

gtm.js

102 ms

bootstrap.css

477 ms

bootstrap-breakpoint.css

476 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Floatingpowerplant.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Img.youtube.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Floatingpowerplant.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 316.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Floatingpowerplant.com main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 98.4 kB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Floating Power Plant images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 49.2 kB

  • Original 110.2 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 61.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 147.0 kB

  • Original 171.3 kB
  • After minification 146.4 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Floatingpowerplant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 147.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (25%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Floating Power Plant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

floatingpowerplant.com

floatingpowerplant.com

272 ms

floatingpowerplant.com

floatingpowerplant.com

794 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

102 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

477 ms

bootstrap-breakpoint.css

bootstrap-breakpoint.css

476 ms

styles.css

styles.css

667 ms

lity.css

lity.css

492 ms

0.jpg

0.jpg

66 ms

fpp_menu_ani.gif

fpp_menu_ani.gif

492 ms

fpp_logo_neg.svg

fpp_logo_neg.svg

493 ms

fpp_to-shore-or-power-2-x-003.png

fpp_to-shore-or-power-2-x-003.png

1725 ms

fpp_forside_kort_omraader.png

fpp_forside_kort_omraader.png

650 ms

fpp_forside_illustration_2021.svg

fpp_forside_illustration_2021.svg

939 ms

fpp_forside_collage.png

fpp_forside_collage.png

2253 ms

fpp_forside_illu_el-01.svg

fpp_forside_illu_el-01.svg

583 ms

fpp_forside_illu_penge-01.svg

fpp_forside_illu_penge-01.svg

743 ms

fpp_forside_illu_verden-01.svg

fpp_forside_illu_verden-01.svg

745 ms

0.jpg

0.jpg

90 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

63 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

841 ms

lity.js

lity.js

760 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

jquery.lazyload.js

823 ms

fpp_forside_statement1_underskrift.png

fpp_forside_statement1_underskrift.png

855 ms

cefront.png

cefront.png

919 ms

dtu.png

dtu.png

932 ms

fritzschurenergy.png

fritzschurenergy.png

970 ms

siemens.png

siemens.png

1008 ms

aalborguni.png

aalborguni.png

1022 ms

technipfmc.png

technipfmc.png

1023 ms

semco-cmyk.jpg

semco-cmyk.jpg

1380 ms

seasystems.png

seasystems.png

1100 ms

fpp_icon_linkedin_neg.svg

fpp_icon_linkedin_neg.svg

1110 ms

uc.js

uc.js

254 ms

fpp_forside_statement_graham_foto.png

fpp_forside_statement_graham_foto.png

862 ms

GEOGROTESQUE-REGULAR.woff

GEOGROTESQUE-REGULAR.woff

446 ms

GEOGROTESQUE-BOLD.woff

GEOGROTESQUE-BOLD.woff

465 ms

Accessibility Review

floatingpowerplant.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

floatingpowerplant.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

floatingpowerplant.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Floatingpowerplant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Floatingpowerplant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

floatingpowerplant.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Floating Power Plant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: