3.9 sec in total
771 ms
2.1 sec
998 ms
Click here to check amazing Float Tucson content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about floattucson.com
Visit floattucson.comWe analyzed Floattucson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 771 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
floattucson.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.2 s
0/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
Value6,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value33.2 s
0/100
10%
771 ms
15 ms
41 ms
56 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (106 requests) were addressed to the original Floattucson.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (771 ms) belongs to the original domain Floattucson.com.
Page size can be reduced by 285.9 kB (13%)
2.2 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Floattucson.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Float Tucson images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Floattucson.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 102 (86%)
119
17
The browser has sent 119 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Float Tucson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 75 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
floattucson.com
771 ms
styles.css
15 ms
flexy-breadcrumb-public.css
41 ms
font-awesome.min.css
56 ms
font-awesome.min.css
53 ms
bootstrap-front.css
51 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
54 ms
woocommerce.css
57 ms
style.css
82 ms
theme.css
104 ms
header-footer.css
102 ms
elementor-icons.css
92 ms
frontend.css
95 ms
swiper.css
86 ms
post-3283.css
102 ms
frontend.css
119 ms
all.css
106 ms
v4-shims.css
117 ms
post-5961.css
133 ms
post-5956.css
111 ms
post-4100.css
110 ms
post-10648.css
112 ms
post-9914.css
115 ms
css
103 ms
fontawesome.css
136 ms
solid.css
134 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.js
152 ms
regenerator-runtime.js
150 ms
wp-polyfill.js
167 ms
hooks.js
147 ms
w.js
103 ms
jquery.js
198 ms
jquery-migrate.js
154 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
158 ms
add-to-cart.js
153 ms
js.cookie.js
154 ms
woocommerce.js
156 ms
react-refresh-runtime.js
156 ms
optimize.js
133 ms
js
154 ms
connect.js
105 ms
seal.js
160 ms
css
132 ms
css
144 ms
css
156 ms
api.js
101 ms
api.js
145 ms
wc-blocks.css
156 ms
mailpoet-public.6d11f60f.css
148 ms
animations.min.css
124 ms
react-refresh-entry.js
141 ms
v4-shims.js
117 ms
index.js
109 ms
index.js
105 ms
flexy-breadcrumb-public.js
105 ms
accordion-custom.js
86 ms
accordion.js
82 ms
sourcebuster.js
101 ms
order-attribution.js
92 ms
react.js
95 ms
deprecated.js
93 ms
dom.js
95 ms
react-dom.js
326 ms
escape-html.js
85 ms
element.js
156 ms
is-shallow-equal.js
280 ms
i18n.js
81 ms
keycodes.js
80 ms
priority-queue.js
136 ms
compose.js
264 ms
private-apis.js
135 ms
redux-routine.js
244 ms
data.js
281 ms
lodash.js
278 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
239 ms
url.js
240 ms
api-fetch.js
240 ms
wc-settings.js
274 ms
data-controls.js
277 ms
html-entities.js
274 ms
notices.js
276 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
274 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
276 ms
dom-ready.js
275 ms
a11y.js
274 ms
primitives.js
273 ms
warning.js
288 ms
blocks-components.js
290 ms
blocks-checkout.js
333 ms
g.gif
245 ms
order-attribution-blocks.js
264 ms
index.js
262 ms
jquery.smartmenus.js
266 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
309 ms
public.js
307 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.js
305 ms
webpack.runtime.js
305 ms
frontend-modules.js
370 ms
frontend.js
369 ms
waypoints.js
366 ms
fbevents.js
260 ms
js
213 ms
core.js
333 ms
frontend.js
300 ms
elements-handlers.js
333 ms
drip-no-logo.jpg
344 ms
CloudNine-logo2020-lg.png
310 ms
chat-150x150.png
306 ms
home-desktop-vid-no-type.jpg
307 ms
home-video-best-of-mobile-th.jpg
305 ms
icons-floating.png
303 ms
google-button.jpg
303 ms
secure90x72.gif
95 ms
js
177 ms
analytics.js
172 ms
storage.html
29 ms
font
187 ms
font
292 ms
font
295 ms
eicons.woff
294 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
292 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
289 ms
flloatlogos-300x75.jpg
289 ms
trip.png
288 ms
facebook.png
331 ms
yelp.png
330 ms
recaptcha__en.js
206 ms
collect
72 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
72 ms
floattucson.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
floattucson.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
floattucson.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Floattucson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Floattucson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
floattucson.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Float Tucson. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: