5.7 sec in total
446 ms
3.5 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Floodlight content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about floodlight.design
We are a digital agency solving client's business challenges with technology. Have a business challenge? We'd love to discuss!
Visit floodlight.designWe analyzed Floodlight.design page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
floodlight.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value4,500 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
446 ms
346 ms
310 ms
417 ms
472 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Floodlight.design, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Floodlight.design.
Page size can be reduced by 116.2 kB (7%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Floodlight.design main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Floodlight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Floodlight.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)
25
15
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Floodlight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
floodlight.design
446 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
346 ms
odometer-theme-minimal.css
310 ms
style.scss
417 ms
jquery.min.js
472 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
304 ms
core.min.js
382 ms
effect.min.js
639 ms
lib.js
710 ms
script.js
760 ms
odometer.min.js
662 ms
js
120 ms
font-awesome.min.css
193 ms
email-decode.min.js
428 ms
lblue-circle.png
270 ms
logo-desktop.svg
299 ms
f-circle-black.svg
268 ms
HP_HomeHero.png
639 ms
princeton-economics-home-2x-scaled.jpg
690 ms
blueprint-labs-2x-scaled.jpg
335 ms
isen-listing-thumb.jpg
580 ms
doran-home-2x-scaled.jpg
774 ms
home-page-hero@2x-01.jpg
936 ms
techsmart-home-2x-optimized.jpg
867 ms
logo-footer.svg
916 ms
CircularStd-Book.otf
941 ms
CircularStd-Medium.otf
1036 ms
CircularStd-Bold.otf
1045 ms
Chap-Regular.woff
1041 ms
Chap-Light.woff
1123 ms
Chap-Semibold.woff
1176 ms
Chap-Bold.ttf
1880 ms
Chap-Black.woff
1881 ms
invisible.js
970 ms
floodlight.design accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
floodlight.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
floodlight.design SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Floodlight.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Floodlight.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
floodlight.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Floodlight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: