Tools & Wizards About Us
flowerclick.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

flowerclick.net

??ҹ?͡??? | ?觴͡??? | ??ҹ?͡??? FlowerClick ?Ѻ?觴͡?????ǡ?ا෾?ѹ???

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

565 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

401 ms

flowerclick.net screenshot

About Website

Visit flowerclick.net now to see the best up-to-date Flower Click content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flowerclick.net

??ҹ?͡??? ??ԡ???觴͡??? FlowerClick ?????ҹ?͡??? ????ԡ???觴͡??? ?觴͡???????س ?觴͡????ҤҾ???? ??Ẻ?͡?????? 80 Ẻ ??????͡ ??Сͺ???? ??ʹ͡??? ?????Ҵ͡??? ??꡵Ҵ͡??? ᨡѹ?͡??? ?ǧ??մ ??? ?͡???ʴ ??? ?͡?????? ???ǡ?ا෾? ??

Visit flowerclick.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Flowerclick.net page load time and found that the first response time was 565 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flowerclick.net performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flowerclick.net

565 ms

www.flowerclick.net

883 ms

jquery-1.3.2.js

714 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

480 ms

api.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Flowerclick.net, 25% (23 requests) were made to Vc1i.rweb-images.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Vc1i.rweb-images.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.3 kB (38%)

Content Size

803.6 kB

After Optimization

500.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flowerclick.net main page is 803.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 404.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 73.9 kB

  • Original 97.4 kB
  • After minification 96.5 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 209.1 kB

  • Original 404.5 kB
  • After minification 195.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flower Click needs image optimization as it can save up to 209.1 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 271.5 kB
  • After minification 271.5 kB
  • After compression 252.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 30.1 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flowerclick.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (48%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flower Click. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

flowerclick.net

flowerclick.net

565 ms

www.flowerclick.net

www.flowerclick.net

883 ms

jquery-1.3.2.js

jquery-1.3.2.js

714 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

jquery.lazyload.js

480 ms

api.js

api.js

54 ms

stm30.js

stm30.js

502 ms

encrytion_password.js

encrytion_password.js

522 ms

all.js

all.js

20 ms

rssreader.aspx

rssreader.aspx

538 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

9 ms

recaptcha__th.js

recaptcha__th.js

127 ms

images

images

124 ms

ready_bar_button02.png

ready_bar_button02.png

285 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

267 ms

dot.gif

dot.gif

255 ms

bullet0016.gif

bullet0016.gif

277 ms

banner22867.jpg

banner22867.jpg

242 ms

banner22866.gif

banner22866.gif

478 ms

banner43257.jpg

banner43257.jpg

506 ms

banner25470.jpg

banner25470.jpg

507 ms

banner22858.gif

banner22858.gif

534 ms

banner22758.gif

banner22758.gif

537 ms

untitled11%281%29.png

untitled11%281%29.png

550 ms

Logo%20Productnation.JPG

Logo%20Productnation.JPG

713 ms

1472574901flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472574901flowerclicknet1.jpg

756 ms

icon0006.gif

icon0006.gif

744 ms

1472489627flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472489627flowerclicknet1.jpg

779 ms

icon0005.gif

icon0005.gif

784 ms

1706249849flowerclicknet1.jpg

1706249849flowerclicknet1.jpg

800 ms

1527500994flowerclicknet1.jpg

1527500994flowerclicknet1.jpg

947 ms

icon0004.gif

icon0004.gif

982 ms

1472423239flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472423239flowerclicknet1.jpg

1005 ms

1474098986flowerclicknet1.jpg

1474098986flowerclicknet1.jpg

1024 ms

icon0002.gif

icon0002.gif

1031 ms

1472581314flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472581314flowerclicknet1.jpg

1056 ms

1373703797flowerclicknet1.jpg

1373703797flowerclicknet1.jpg

1182 ms

1199945444flowerclicknet1.gif

1199945444flowerclicknet1.gif

1219 ms

1231998701flowerclicknet1.gif

1231998701flowerclicknet1.gif

1254 ms

powered-by-rp-2020.svg

powered-by-rp-2020.svg

1280 ms

flowerclicknet.css

flowerclicknet.css

1277 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

1313 ms

all.js

all.js

10 ms

dot.gif

dot.gif

1681 ms

bullet0016.gif

bullet0016.gif

1630 ms

ready_bar_button02.png

ready_bar_button02.png

2991 ms

untitled11(1).png

untitled11(1).png

2540 ms

Logo%20Productnation.JPG

Logo%20Productnation.JPG

1602 ms

icon0006.gif

icon0006.gif

1572 ms

1472574901flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472574901flowerclicknet1.jpg

2843 ms

1472489627flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472489627flowerclicknet1.jpg

1847 ms

icon0005.gif

icon0005.gif

1810 ms

1706249849flowerclicknet1.jpg

1706249849flowerclicknet1.jpg

2149 ms

1527500994flowerclicknet1.jpg

1527500994flowerclicknet1.jpg

2290 ms

icon0004.gif

icon0004.gif

1979 ms

1472423239flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472423239flowerclicknet1.jpg

2334 ms

1474098986flowerclicknet1.jpg

1474098986flowerclicknet1.jpg

2324 ms

icon0002.gif

icon0002.gif

2427 ms

1472581314flowerclicknet1.jpg

1472581314flowerclicknet1.jpg

2554 ms

rssreader.aspx

rssreader.aspx

1126 ms

1373703797flowerclicknet1.jpg

1373703797flowerclicknet1.jpg

2451 ms

1199945444flowerclicknet1.gif

1199945444flowerclicknet1.gif

2478 ms

1231998701flowerclicknet1.gif

1231998701flowerclicknet1.gif

2435 ms

webbg.gif

webbg.gif

724 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

251 ms

bg0046.gif

bg0046.gif

272 ms

side0022.gif

side0022.gif

236 ms

side0022.gif

side0022.gif

2276 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

2392 ms

bg0046.gif

bg0046.gif

2380 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

52 ms

lazy.gif

lazy.gif

298 ms

anchor

anchor

53 ms

like_box.php

like_box.php

300 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__th.js

recaptcha__th.js

16 ms

sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js

sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js

61 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

55 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

42 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

69 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

74 ms

recaptcha__th.js

recaptcha__th.js

55 ms

lazy.gif

lazy.gif

1420 ms

HADo6_noYei.css

HADo6_noYei.css

20 ms

ltIISpvIIY8.js

ltIISpvIIY8.js

33 ms

teTZ2tZqwkq.js

teTZ2tZqwkq.js

68 ms

BECqV_OB-Tv.js

BECqV_OB-Tv.js

71 ms

xNa_5SPtPNu.js

xNa_5SPtPNu.js

69 ms

q4SZVAjzsaO.js

q4SZVAjzsaO.js

68 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

67 ms

359729039_756152906514534_1186399291737764473_n.jpg

359729039_756152906514534_1186399291737764473_n.jpg

49 ms

305201229_508089821320845_4671592904633238015_n.jpg

305201229_508089821320845_4671592904633238015_n.jpg

17 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

12 ms

Accessibility Review

flowerclick.net accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

flowerclick.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

flowerclick.net SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-874

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flowerclick.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flowerclick.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-874. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

flowerclick.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Flower Click. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: