Tools & Wizards About Us
flying-lines.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

flying-lines.com

Flying Lines - A hub of Fabulous Web Novel Community: Best Translation for Best Novels

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

642 ms

flying-lines.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to flying-lines.com homepage info - get ready to check Flying Lines best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about flying-lines.com

Flying Lines dedicate to providing the most trendy novel updates in English. Join us to read your next fantastic web novel and romance fiction!

Visit flying-lines.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Flying-lines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flying-lines.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,120 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flying-lines.com

141 ms

www.flying-lines.com

5351 ms

swiper.min.css

170 ms

bootstrap.min.css

173 ms

app.css

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Flying-lines.com, 70% (30 requests) were made to Cdn.flying-lines.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Flying-lines.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (57%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flying-lines.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 25.1 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flying Lines needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 543.4 kB

  • Original 803.1 kB
  • After minification 803.1 kB
  • After compression 259.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 543.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 494.5 kB

  • Original 572.6 kB
  • After minification 572.3 kB
  • After compression 78.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flying-lines.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 494.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (39%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flying Lines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

flying-lines.com

flying-lines.com

141 ms

www.flying-lines.com

www.flying-lines.com

5351 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

170 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

173 ms

app.css

app.css

181 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

100 ms

firebase-app.js

firebase-app.js

69 ms

firebase-analytics.js

firebase-analytics.js

351 ms

js

js

168 ms

manifest.json

manifest.json

169 ms

jquery-3.4.1.js

jquery-3.4.1.js

203 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

169 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

204 ms

layer.js

layer.js

204 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

204 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

67 ms

firebase-messaging.js

firebase-messaging.js

78 ms

app.js

app.js

205 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

80 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

96 ms

plateformlog.png

plateformlog.png

78 ms

email_imag@2x.png

email_imag@2x.png

182 ms

202108231039.png

202108231039.png

283 ms

icon3x.png

icon3x.png

114 ms

allgenre.png

allgenre.png

70 ms

icons.png

icons.png

84 ms

avatar.jpg

avatar.jpg

72 ms

dailycheckin.png

dailycheckin.png

71 ms

sy_banner_bg.png

sy_banner_bg.png

122 ms

sy_popular_bg.png

sy_popular_bg.png

129 ms

sy_recommended_bg.png

sy_recommended_bg.png

131 ms

sy_topbook_bg.png

sy_topbook_bg.png

123 ms

sy_bird.png

sy_bird.png

124 ms

sy_volunteerPlan.png

sy_volunteerPlan.png

147 ms

latestupdates.png

latestupdates.png

186 ms

down_bg.png

down_bg.png

173 ms

pc@3x.png

pc@3x.png

177 ms

gb.png

gb.png

180 ms

wenhao.png

wenhao.png

186 ms

userimg.png

userimg.png

200 ms

yes.png

yes.png

228 ms

NunitoSans-Regular.ttf

NunitoSans-Regular.ttf

238 ms

layer.css

layer.css

168 ms

Accessibility Review

flying-lines.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

flying-lines.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

flying-lines.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flying-lines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flying-lines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

flying-lines.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flying Lines. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: