7.7 sec in total
741 ms
6.7 sec
208 ms
Welcome to fmea.net homepage info - get ready to check FMEA best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about fmea.net
Als Beratungs- und Unterstützungsdienstleister stehen wir Ihnen stets gerne zur Verfügung. Fundiertes Fachwissen, kombiniert mit der Erfahrung aus umgesetzten
Visit fmea.netWe analyzed Fmea.net page load time and found that the first response time was 741 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
fmea.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.299
40/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
741 ms
542 ms
222 ms
335 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Fmea.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Fmea.net.
Page size can be reduced by 932.6 kB (77%)
1.2 MB
275.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Fmea.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 654.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 368 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FMEA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 497.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 497.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 381.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fmea.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 381.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (94%)
77
5
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FMEA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fmea.net
741 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
542 ms
front.css
222 ms
aTables.css
335 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
advps-style.css
331 ms
jquery.dop.Select.css
335 ms
style.css
438 ms
mobile.css
546 ms
style2-os.css
471 ms
lightbox.css
551 ms
shariff.min.local.css
777 ms
simple-author-box.min.css
890 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
1214 ms
font-awesome.css
904 ms
mobilenav.css
687 ms
dashicons.min.css
1098 ms
thickbox.css
910 ms
amazonjs-force.css
991 ms
style.css
1209 ms
animate.min.css
1556 ms
font-awesome.min.css
10 ms
wpgmza_style.css
1238 ms
jquery.js
1762 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1416 ms
jquery.color.min.js
1427 ms
jquery.animate-shadow-min.js
1425 ms
wph_editor_public.js
1568 ms
aTables.min.js
1847 ms
jquery.blImageCenter.aTables.js
1754 ms
advps.frnt.script.js
1644 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
1980 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
2109 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
2074 ms
jquery.theme-main.min.js
2069 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
1971 ms
ajax-comments.min.js
2068 ms
mobilenav.min.js
2067 ms
style.css
1882 ms
effects.css
2283 ms
style.css
1971 ms
flexslider.css
1977 ms
public.css
1990 ms
public.css
1968 ms
ninja-forms-display.css
2085 ms
qtip.css
2055 ms
jquery.rating.css
2050 ms
widget-calendar-full.css
2113 ms
widget-calendar-theme.css
1950 ms
content-shortcodes.css
2062 ms
core.min.js
1844 ms
datepicker.min.js
2184 ms
widget.min.js
2029 ms
mouse.min.js
1866 ms
slider.min.js
1885 ms
jquery.dop.Select.js
1844 ms
jquery.dop.frontend.BSPCalendar.js
2912 ms
jquery.dop.frontend.BSPSearch.js
2398 ms
navigation.js
1732 ms
portfolio-all.js
1775 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
2055 ms
public.min.js
1865 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1792 ms
custom-pagination.js
1774 ms
front_end_js.js
1822 ms
thickbox.js
1958 ms
jquery.classycountdown.js
1894 ms
jquery.knob.js
1839 ms
jquery.throttle.js
1808 ms
jquery.timeTo.min.js
1998 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
2247 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2129 ms
underscore.min.js
2110 ms
backbone.min.js
2078 ms
AAAAApJREFUCNdjYAAAAAIAAeIhvDMAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
13 ms
AX1WvhCgiWNtAwYrXS53mzWulgBoeRoy8ZqG0kdYidpb1z3Uu9w4Bjb3TE3ByQcU4tSbhLIt0eLjtLhxOFs0Zmbkx73LoZcPG0s43TVx6kraeNbJjkvgCKXKruZebmuu1R8y+mNpVhUY1TpPfV9IPfa7H4M6NE9UMWWxP2f9i3y0cs1xB0IgqeQZzBCeAl6jQneH6LPe4LwJfpOCeqmqf8Q2tZWP6p2Kl8Q+r48AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
11 ms
ninja-forms-display.min.js
2291 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2502 ms
vantage-icons.woff
2125 ms
FMEA_Logo.jpg
2418 ms
style-glass.png
1672 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
426 ms
fmea.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
fmea.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
fmea.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fmea.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fmea.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fmea.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FMEA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: