Tools & Wizards About Us
focusadonline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

focusadonline.com

Focus Advertising Specialties - Promotional Products and Apparel - Santa Fe, NM: HOME

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

2.9 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

focusadonline.com screenshot

About Website

Visit focusadonline.com now to see the best up-to-date Focus Adonline content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about focusadonline.com

Create imprinted promotional items for companies & organizations: Awards, mugs, pens, apparel, advertising specialties, keytags, coins, lapel pins, decals, logos, caps, gifts, novelties, souvenirs, em...

Visit focusadonline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Focusadonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

focusadonline.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,740 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.focusadonline.com

2934 ms

bootstrap.min.css

36 ms

css

35 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

71 ms

flexslider.css

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Focusadonline.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Promoplace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Focusadonline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 576.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Focusadonline.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 92.2 kB

  • Original 109.5 kB
  • After minification 97.8 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 186.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Focus Adonline needs image optimization as it can save up to 186.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 235.5 kB

  • Original 597.3 kB
  • After minification 596.8 kB
  • After compression 361.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 235.5 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 61.5 kB

  • Original 278.4 kB
  • After minification 278.4 kB
  • After compression 216.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Focusadonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.5 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (39%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

56

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Focus Adonline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.focusadonline.com

www.focusadonline.com

2934 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

36 ms

css

css

35 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

71 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

105 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

248 ms

slick.css

slick.css

139 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

140 ms

yamm.css

yamm.css

140 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

140 ms

StyleSheet

StyleSheet

279 ms

Pic

Pic

173 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

210 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

265 ms

migrate-3.1.0.js

migrate-3.1.0.js

175 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

210 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

211 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

264 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

264 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

264 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

280 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

281 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

iframeResizer.min.js

280 ms

IFrameUtils.js

IFrameUtils.js

280 ms

jquery.backstretch.min.js

jquery.backstretch.min.js

281 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

335 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

335 ms

datepicker-fr-ca.js

datepicker-fr-ca.js

336 ms

custom.js

custom.js

335 ms

highslide-full.packed.js

highslide-full.packed.js

336 ms

highslide.config.js

highslide.config.js

336 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

419 ms

element.js

element.js

104 ms

css

css

18 ms

icon-5.png

icon-5.png

482 ms

icon-6.png

icon-6.png

481 ms

icon-7.png

icon-7.png

483 ms

close.png

close.png

112 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

113 ms

prev.png

prev.png

114 ms

next.png

next.png

113 ms

QPic

QPic

150 ms

QPic

QPic

152 ms

QPic

QPic

152 ms

QPic

QPic

151 ms

QPic

QPic

151 ms

QPic

QPic

151 ms

QPic

QPic

197 ms

QPic

QPic

196 ms

QPic

QPic

191 ms

QPic

QPic

189 ms

QPic

QPic

207 ms

QPic

QPic

215 ms

QPic

QPic

264 ms

QPic

QPic

264 ms

QPic

QPic

266 ms

QPic

QPic

266 ms

QPic

QPic

391 ms

QPic

QPic

476 ms

QPic

QPic

476 ms

QPic

QPic

477 ms

QPic

QPic

478 ms

QPic

QPic

477 ms

QPic

QPic

478 ms

QPic

QPic

479 ms

QPic

QPic

480 ms

iFz3HMmJPBY

iFz3HMmJPBY

194 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

480 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

454 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

455 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

454 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

478 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

478 ms

font

font

122 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

612 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

518 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

609 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

610 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

609 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

572 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

606 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

573 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

572 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

573 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

572 ms

WEBlogPic

WEBlogPic

662 ms

WEBlogPic

WEBlogPic

625 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

529 ms

linkpic-1.png

linkpic-1.png

643 ms

sdvosb.png

sdvosb.png

631 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

11 ms

Pic

Pic

604 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

26 ms

base.js

base.js

50 ms

Pic

Pic

538 ms

Pic

Pic

622 ms

Pic

Pic

588 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

132 ms

Pic

Pic

467 ms

Uo_dhVY9o5gWds10f-QE3r7w2DYPAY7ZjhqsbDUx1y0.js

Uo_dhVY9o5gWds10f-QE3r7w2DYPAY7ZjhqsbDUx1y0.js

110 ms

embed.js

embed.js

42 ms

id

id

16 ms

Create

Create

84 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

15 ms

custom.png

custom.png

35 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

35 ms

loader.white.gif

loader.white.gif

35 ms

Accessibility Review

focusadonline.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

focusadonline.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

focusadonline.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Focusadonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Focusadonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

focusadonline.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Focus Adonline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: