Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

fodm.in

Learn Digital Marketing Fundamental and Strategies - FODM

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

802 ms

fodm.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fodm.in homepage info - get ready to check FODM best content right away, or after learning these important things about fodm.in

FODM short for 'Fundamentals of Digital Marketing' is the premier digital marketing site for beginners providing the best resources on digital marketing through blogs, reports videos, frameworks, Q&A ...

Visit fodm.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Fodm.in page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fodm.in performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,750 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fodm.in

34 ms

www.fodm.in

99 ms

gtm.js

93 ms

css

48 ms

style.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 205 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (180 requests) were addressed to the original Fodm.in, 9% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (970 ms) relates to the external source Fodmin.api.oneall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Fodm.in main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 168.0 kB

  • Original 198.7 kB
  • After minification 191.8 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 46.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FODM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 681.9 kB
  • After minification 681.6 kB
  • After compression 661.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 229.1 kB
  • After minification 229.1 kB
  • After compression 219.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fodm.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 142 (78%)

Requests Now

181

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 181 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FODM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 98 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 46 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fodm.in accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

fodm.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fodm.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fodm.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fodm.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FODM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: