Tools & Wizards About Us
foilprint.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

foilprint.com

Foilprint Inc. -A Product Printing Decorating Company

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

599 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

foilprint.com screenshot

About Website

Visit foilprint.com now to see the best up-to-date Foilprint content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foilprint.com

Our Services include digital printing, label printing, imprinted mugs as well as decorating, imprinting & marking on manufacturer's 3-dimensional parts.

Visit foilprint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Foilprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 599 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foilprint.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.4 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,370 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.foilprint.com

599 ms

gtm.js

59 ms

style.min.css

55 ms

styles.css

58 ms

settings.css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Foilprint.com, 29% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (599 ms) belongs to the original domain Foilprint.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 84.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Foilprint.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 596.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 96.1 kB
  • After minification 92.1 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 603 B

  • Original 479.3 kB
  • After minification 478.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foilprint images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 596.1 kB
  • After minification 596.1 kB
  • After compression 588.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 215.5 kB
  • After minification 215.5 kB
  • After compression 211.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foilprint.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (70%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foilprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.foilprint.com

www.foilprint.com

599 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

59 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

55 ms

styles.css

styles.css

58 ms

settings.css

settings.css

60 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

58 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

full-styles.6.1.6.css

full-styles.6.1.6.css

98 ms

mkhb-render.css

mkhb-render.css

72 ms

mkhb-row.css

mkhb-row.css

65 ms

mkhb-column.css

mkhb-column.css

66 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

130 ms

theme-options-production-1711127716_en.css

theme-options-production-1711127716_en.css

82 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

81 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

168 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

167 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

169 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

168 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

119 ms

css

css

115 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

92 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

91 ms

index.js

index.js

91 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

91 ms

full-scripts.6.1.6.js

full-scripts.6.1.6.js

108 ms

mkhb-render.js

mkhb-render.js

91 ms

mkhb-column.js

mkhb-column.js

107 ms

api.js

api.js

161 ms

index.js

index.js

107 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

106 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

160 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

106 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

365 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

366 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

366 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

365 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

384 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

384 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

386 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

386 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

385 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

386 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

387 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

386 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf

420 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rm.ttf

388 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

420 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

388 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rm.ttf

446 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf

444 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

446 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rm.ttf

447 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rm.ttf

446 ms

fr.png

fr.png

351 ms

en.png

en.png

351 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

351 ms

labels-slider.jpg

labels-slider.jpg

354 ms

home-banner-01.jpg

home-banner-01.jpg

355 ms

home-banner-02.jpg

home-banner-02.jpg

350 ms

home-banner-03.jpg

home-banner-03.jpg

436 ms

home-banner-04.jpg

home-banner-04.jpg

439 ms

home-banner-05.jpg

home-banner-05.jpg

439 ms

2849729434.png

2849729434.png

412 ms

pUNFvCTcFK0

pUNFvCTcFK0

486 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

289 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

259 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

123 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

100 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

9 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

28 ms

base.js

base.js

52 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

165 ms

e5gkbp-8e8yKHwawBMj382SRQ9vyiiQXFxpBeadiAZg.js

e5gkbp-8e8yKHwawBMj382SRQ9vyiiQXFxpBeadiAZg.js

100 ms

embed.js

embed.js

38 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

19 ms

id

id

27 ms

Accessibility Review

foilprint.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

foilprint.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

foilprint.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foilprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foilprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

foilprint.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foilprint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: