8.8 sec in total
2.6 sec
5.1 sec
1.1 sec
Visit foliodock.com now to see the best up-to-date Foliodock content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foliodock.com
Create your Portfolio App for iPad, Tablets, Iphones or Android with Foliodock
Visit foliodock.comWe analyzed Foliodock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
foliodock.com performance score
2616 ms
112 ms
557 ms
201 ms
11 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Foliodock.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Foliodock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 37.0 kB (4%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Foliodock.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 944.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foliodock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 132 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foliodock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (59%)
75
31
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foliodock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foliodock.com
2616 ms
normalize.css
112 ms
g=basic_css
557 ms
style.css
201 ms
jquery.min.js
11 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
209 ms
button.css
226 ms
form.css
237 ms
jetpack.css
258 ms
usernoise.js
327 ms
button.js
337 ms
scripts.js
350 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
362 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
64 ms
wpgroho.js
381 ms
wp-embed.min.js
524 ms
e-201611.js
8 ms
g=basic_js
546 ms
jquery.socialshareprivacy.min.js
684 ms
script.js
682 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
239 ms
176 ms
bg.png
358 ms
home-bg-body.png
360 ms
home-bg-top.png
358 ms
sprite.png
570 ms
dummyimages.png
676 ms
mac_startseite.png
422 ms
macbookdemoposter.jpg
426 ms
ipad_startseite.png
754 ms
ipaddemoposter.jpg
369 ms
startbild.png
525 ms
connected.png
544 ms
myapp.png
536 ms
sync.png
633 ms
ipad_and_iphone.png
647 ms
1024x769px.png
649 ms
screenshot-pier-1-400px.jpg
675 ms
screenshot-pier-2-800px.jpg
943 ms
screenshot-pier-3-400px.jpg
874 ms
screenshot-pier-4-400px.jpg
874 ms
screenshot-pier-5-400px.jpg
799 ms
screenshot-pier-1-800px.jpg
909 ms
screenshot-pier-3-800px.jpg
958 ms
screenshot-pier-4-800px.jpg
1027 ms
screenshot-pier-5-800px.jpg
1181 ms
ok.png
1111 ms
Bitter-Regular-webfont.woff
970 ms
Bitter-Bold-webfont.woff
1012 ms
Bitter-Italic-webfont.woff
1019 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1065 ms
ga.js
32 ms
hovercard.css
52 ms
services.css
52 ms
loginbox
1576 ms
dummy_facebook_en.png
1160 ms
dummy_twitter.png
1163 ms
dummy_gplus.png
1166 ms
g.gif
3 ms
ga.js
4 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
socialshareprivacy_on_off.png
1360 ms
style.20120728.css
1249 ms
add2home.20120728.css
1102 ms
swipe.20120728.css
1111 ms
webapp.20120728.css
1275 ms
modernizr-2.6.1.min.js
1298 ms
add2home.min.js
1243 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
1256 ms
swipe.min.js
1214 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
1227 ms
_script.js
1224 ms
socialshareprivacy_info.png
1230 ms
settings.png
1165 ms
foliodocklogo.png
134 ms
ajax-loader.gif
179 ms
icn-home.png
197 ms
icn-description.png
201 ms
__utm.gif
4 ms
foliodock.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foliodock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Foliodock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foliodock.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foliodock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: