871 ms in total
190 ms
552 ms
129 ms
Click here to check amazing Fontaine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fontaine.org
Visit fontaine.orgWe analyzed Fontaine.org page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 681 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
fontaine.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
190 ms
68 ms
112 ms
76 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Fontaine.org, 30% (10 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (290 ms) belongs to the original domain Fontaine.org.
Page size can be reduced by 101.5 kB (13%)
796.9 kB
695.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Fontaine.org main page is 796.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 677.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fontaine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 34.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fontaine.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (47%)
30
16
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fontaine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fontaine.org
190 ms
styles.css
68 ms
styles.css
112 ms
style.css
76 ms
u3_small_1.jpg
290 ms
u3_small_1.jpg
166 ms
u5_small_1.jpg
166 ms
u1_small_1.jpg
166 ms
transparent.gif
107 ms
css
67 ms
cse.js
27 ms
u29.png
110 ms
u31.png
38 ms
u37.png
112 ms
u45.png
91 ms
u53.png
92 ms
u61_line.png
47 ms
u62.png
89 ms
u64.png
91 ms
u76_line.png
117 ms
cse.js
63 ms
jsapi
42 ms
default+en.css
6 ms
default.css
43 ms
default+en.I.js
16 ms
u5_small_1.jpg
96 ms
default.css
40 ms
async-ads.js
39 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
36 ms
small-logo.png
25 ms
search_box_icon.png
24 ms
clear.gif
24 ms
nav_logo114.png
26 ms
fontaine.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
fontaine.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fontaine.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fontaine.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fontaine.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fontaine.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fontaine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: