4.9 sec in total
436 ms
3.5 sec
875 ms
Click here to check amazing Font content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fontfont.com
Based in the trendy district of Kreuzberg in Berlin, Germany, FontFont was established in 1990 when FontShop founder Erik Spiekermann and fellow type designe...
Visit fontfont.comWe analyzed Fontfont.com page load time and found that the first response time was 436 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
fontfont.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value3,120 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
436 ms
267 ms
690 ms
472 ms
474 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Fontfont.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to Render01.fontshop.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fontfont.com.
Page size can be reduced by 501.3 kB (10%)
4.8 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Fontfont.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Font images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 234.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 234.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fontfont.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 241.5 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (35%)
26
17
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Font. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fontfont.com
436 ms
screen.css
267 ms
scripts.js
690 ms
fontfont_application.js
472 ms
font_rend.php
474 ms
font_rend.php
459 ms
font_rend.php
446 ms
font_rend.php
442 ms
font_rend.php
439 ms
font_rend.php
437 ms
ff_logo.png
311 ms
tab_shadow.png
329 ms
heart_faded.png
328 ms
cart_faded.png
340 ms
icon_random.png
341 ms
small-search.png
339 ms
FF_Chartwell_Lines_2560x1030.jpg
1417 ms
indicator.gif
449 ms
arrow_yellow.png
353 ms
socialmedia.png
405 ms
DagnyWebPro-Regular.woff
597 ms
DagnyWebPro-Bold.woff
351 ms
ga.js
181 ms
FF_Chartwell_Floating_Bars_Vertical_2560x1030.jpg
1180 ms
FF_Chartwell_Floating_Areas_2560x1030.jpg
856 ms
FF_Chartwell_Floating_Rings_2560x1030.jpg
1289 ms
FF_Chartwell_Scatter_2560x1030.jpg
958 ms
FF_Chartwell_Bubbles_2560x1030.jpg
1244 ms
DagnyWebPro-RegularItalic.woff
931 ms
DagnyWebPro-BoldItalic.woff
1013 ms
__utm.gif
41 ms
fontfont.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fontfont.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
fontfont.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fontfont.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fontfont.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fontfont.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Font. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: