4.7 sec in total
50 ms
4.3 sec
349 ms
Visit fontgazer.com now to see the best up-to-date Fontgazer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fontgazer.com
SIP, Prepaid calling card platform, Call Shop Billing, IAX2 Softphone, VOIP Private Label Solutions, DID, Wholesale Termination, Hosted PBX
Visit fontgazer.comWe analyzed Fontgazer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
fontgazer.com performance score
50 ms
342 ms
49 ms
63 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fontgazer.com, 21% (15 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 19% (14 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.cookielaw.org.
Page size can be reduced by 112.7 kB (34%)
330.6 kB
217.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Fontgazer.com main page is 330.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 142.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 453 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 114 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fontgazer.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (76%)
54
13
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fontgazer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fontgazer.com
50 ms
fontgazer
342 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
63 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js
90 ms
jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js
63 ms
api.js
64 ms
7492f661-79f4-4ab2-90f2-6a9eaf984a75.css
106 ms
main.ab37538d.chunk.css
215 ms
modern.css
217 ms
dataTable.css
359 ms
email-decode.min.js
21 ms
general.js
357 ms
2.d86b272a.chunk.js
308 ms
main.9df85be3.chunk.js
201 ms
recaptcha__de.js
58 ms
gtm.js
149 ms
roundtrip.js
845 ms
optimize.js
846 ms
heap-125193602.js
1110 ms
otSDKStub.js
1346 ms
fontscom-logo.svg
453 ms
webicon-facebook.svg
410 ms
webicon-twitter.svg
412 ms
webicon-dribbble.svg
411 ms
headertranslation
413 ms
footertranslation
707 ms
415da429-1421-4092-8734-6d98c54791b0.woff
391 ms
ss-pika.woff
395 ms
4b603308-1f36-48f6-be79-dd806bf12b9e.woff
393 ms
d06ce606-83ae-4a0d-b2d3-b436b11b26a6.woff
708 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
shim.latest.js
551 ms
K2NDTXMZWRG6JL7A3ZDWLK
546 ms
index.js
266 ms
collect
227 ms
www.monotype.com
332 ms
h
169 ms
712246df-3398-4b18-b432-ac874df7cfa2.json
122 ms
collect
299 ms
frame.164824f4.js
157 ms
vendor.9aee31bc.js
219 ms
otBannerSdk.js
155 ms
AM6NYRHBOJCLPJEHWA67LF.js
190 ms
en.json
91 ms
ga-audiences
80 ms
fbevents.js
219 ms
out
170 ms
out
295 ms
out
259 ms
out
262 ms
out
262 ms
out
293 ms
out
293 ms
out
322 ms
out
323 ms
out
325 ms
out
328 ms
otFlat.json
167 ms
otPcTab.json
198 ms
otCommonStyles.css
190 ms
517377651761961
122 ms
tap.php
556 ms
Pug
677 ms
poweredBy_ot_logo.svg
126 ms
sync
132 ms
pixel
134 ms
in
119 ms
sd
112 ms
in
29 ms
xuid
45 ms
bounce
21 ms
rum
63 ms
fontgazer.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fontgazer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fontgazer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fontgazer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fontgazer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: