7.2 sec in total
630 ms
6.4 sec
130 ms
Visit fontwire.com now to see the best up-to-date Fontwire content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fontwire.com
Explore hundereds of fonts, dingbats, and Image Magick effects. Add them to photos that you upload. Generate cards and logos and send them to a friend or post on Facebook. Add captions and watermarks ...
Visit fontwire.comWe analyzed Fontwire.com page load time and found that the first response time was 630 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
fontwire.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
630 ms
7 ms
432 ms
370 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 216 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (207 requests) were addressed to the original Fontwire.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) belongs to the original domain Fontwire.com.
Page size can be reduced by 708.2 kB (59%)
1.2 MB
501.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Fontwire.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 882.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fontwire needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 563.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 563.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fontwire.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (6%)
214
201
The browser has sent 214 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fontwire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fontwire.com
630 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
432 ms
fontscripts.js
370 ms
spectrum.js
375 ms
fabric.js
595 ms
seeSlide.css
153 ms
jquery-ui.css
281 ms
fontweet.css
300 ms
spectrum.css
426 ms
font-awesome.min.css
524 ms
adsbygoogle.js
22 ms
fontwirelogo2.png
217 ms
loadimage.jpg
513 ms
spinner.gif
367 ms
avatar.jpg
255 ms
counter.js
27 ms
t.php
220 ms
show_ads_impl_single_load.js
168 ms
ca-pub-3366984283289980.js
204 ms
loadfontcollections.php
277 ms
loadfonts.php
347 ms
loaddingcollections.php
398 ms
loaddingbats.php
403 ms
loadthumbs.php
415 ms
loadshapecats.php
470 ms
loader.gif
75 ms
ui-bg_glass_60_eeeeee_1x400.png
146 ms
ui-icons_999999_256x240.png
146 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
660 ms
zrt_lookup.html
40 ms
ads
166 ms
osd.js
5 ms
PoliticalOutline.gif
144 ms
RoteFlora.gif
210 ms
SoyChango.gif
215 ms
Nuku.gif
233 ms
MajorSnafu.gif
286 ms
.gif
293 ms
Icbmss20.gif
357 ms
Icbmss25.gif
358 ms
Lakmus.gif
377 ms
PincoyaBlack_.gif
429 ms
Grafika.gif
440 ms
Grafika2.gif
501 ms
Grafika3.gif
508 ms
Grafika4.gif
506 ms
Grafika1.gif
520 ms
Bauhaus.gif
573 ms
HeadvsHeart.gif
587 ms
StylishCalligraphy.gif
648 ms
QueenOfHeaven.gif
652 ms
LoveSunshine.gif
654 ms
QueenLeela.gif
665 ms
HugMeTight.gif
716 ms
Yozakura_.gif
731 ms
GrandHotel_.gif
793 ms
BerkshireSwash.gif
801 ms
Fascinate_.gif
802 ms
FascinateInline_.gif
824 ms
Peralta.gif
863 ms
ItsadzokeS01_.gif
877 ms
Rastaman.gif
941 ms
loadthumbs.php
954 ms
loadthumbs.php
962 ms
100.gif
882 ms
101.gif
921 ms
102.gif
885 ms
103.gif
936 ms
104.gif
912 ms
105.gif
941 ms
106.gif
940 ms
107.gif
890 ms
108.gif
885 ms
109.gif
881 ms
110.gif
907 ms
111.gif
940 ms
112.gif
944 ms
113.gif
891 ms
114.gif
884 ms
115.gif
884 ms
116.gif
907 ms
117.gif
941 ms
118.gif
946 ms
119.gif
895 ms
120.gif
884 ms
121.gif
880 ms
122.gif
908 ms
48.gif
941 ms
49.gif
944 ms
50.gif
900 ms
51.gif
887 ms
52.gif
894 ms
53.gif
907 ms
54.gif
937 ms
55.gif
928 ms
56.gif
896 ms
57.gif
888 ms
65.gif
894 ms
66.gif
883 ms
67.gif
875 ms
68.gif
874 ms
69.gif
870 ms
70.gif
872 ms
71.gif
896 ms
72.gif
882 ms
73.gif
882 ms
74.gif
879 ms
75.gif
883 ms
76.gif
885 ms
77.gif
896 ms
78.gif
885 ms
79.gif
882 ms
80.gif
878 ms
81.gif
881 ms
82.gif
886 ms
83.gif
895 ms
84.gif
885 ms
85.gif
876 ms
86.gif
878 ms
87.gif
884 ms
88.gif
885 ms
89.gif
900 ms
90.gif
887 ms
97.gif
879 ms
98.gif
882 ms
99.gif
881 ms
100.gif
886 ms
101.gif
880 ms
102.gif
883 ms
103.gif
882 ms
104.gif
886 ms
105.gif
885 ms
106.gif
887 ms
107.gif
880 ms
108.gif
888 ms
109.gif
881 ms
110.gif
890 ms
111.gif
882 ms
112.gif
887 ms
113.gif
880 ms
114.gif
887 ms
115.gif
879 ms
116.gif
886 ms
117.gif
880 ms
118.gif
889 ms
119.gif
877 ms
120.gif
887 ms
121.gif
883 ms
122.gif
887 ms
123.gif
884 ms
124.gif
886 ms
125.gif
874 ms
126.gif
889 ms
127.gif
888 ms
34.gif
885 ms
35.gif
880 ms
36.gif
882 ms
37.gif
871 ms
38.gif
884 ms
40.gif
883 ms
41.gif
882 ms
42.gif
881 ms
43.gif
882 ms
44.gif
874 ms
45.gif
886 ms
46.gif
880 ms
47.gif
878 ms
48.gif
883 ms
49.gif
883 ms
50.gif
874 ms
51.gif
887 ms
52.gif
883 ms
53.gif
877 ms
54.gif
881 ms
55.gif
879 ms
56.gif
875 ms
57.gif
885 ms
58.gif
883 ms
59.gif
878 ms
60.gif
884 ms
61.gif
879 ms
62.gif
875 ms
63.gif
885 ms
66.gif
878 ms
67.gif
882 ms
68.gif
883 ms
69.gif
878 ms
70.gif
878 ms
71.gif
882 ms
72.gif
878 ms
73.gif
886 ms
74.gif
885 ms
75.gif
880 ms
76.gif
878 ms
77.gif
886 ms
78.gif
884 ms
79.gif
886 ms
80.gif
887 ms
81.gif
882 ms
82.gif
892 ms
83.gif
889 ms
84.gif
884 ms
85.gif
893 ms
86.gif
886 ms
87.gif
878 ms
88.gif
894 ms
89.gif
883 ms
90.gif
881 ms
91.gif
892 ms
93.gif
887 ms
94.gif
880 ms
96.gif
890 ms
97.gif
884 ms
98.gif
879 ms
99.gif
892 ms
fontwire.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
fontwire.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
fontwire.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fontwire.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fontwire.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fontwire.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fontwire. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: