1.5 sec in total
110 ms
522 ms
850 ms
Click here to check amazing Foo content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about foo.software
Test and monitor website page experience automatically with Lighthouse. Foo also provides an API and DevOps integrations.
Visit foo.softwareWe analyzed Foo.software page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
foo.software performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value2.3 s
92/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
110 ms
70 ms
80 ms
25 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Foo.software, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) belongs to the original domain Foo.software.
Page size can be reduced by 860.8 kB (40%)
2.2 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Foo.software main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 132.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 648.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 648.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foo.software has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (60%)
45
18
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
foo.software
110 ms
www.foo.software
70 ms
www.foo.software
80 ms
styles.eb5ef597.chunk.css
25 ms
_app.92ef5d13.chunk.css
48 ms
index.56307228.chunk.css
49 ms
polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js
84 ms
webpack-82c62ea98a3f82d9dbd2.js
68 ms
framework.48a441fb05b6de80f4b9.js
105 ms
commons.9567dd5b60db34927905.js
80 ms
main-47300db71d4a220cf0a8.js
103 ms
0a301732.283123e4d2f00c965eb9.js
132 ms
138ac7422abd16baa5f420c9594347e53c301029.4e30a4b8bd337071b0d1.js
102 ms
e84b14c4732401d664f329bbc7a142f7e8c7774e.ea96e9e80edf16b7efa4.js
131 ms
473c80a0b7bee9a50d1c55285969960486bf84e8.f65af75de4eaafc4d6c0.js
139 ms
e121e29c827d391e5a223b384ea7008e8aed12eb.5596c192a02cbe80bed5.js
140 ms
5eef69468aced23528980a716da22850c8d95979.9b8a30c346dffed512c0.js
139 ms
cf83b5cd0d20fda1d4c9662068d4f06917048001.d0aeb4a35acedc9171b1.js
138 ms
7d5bf36e871e350518117a628d71b59bd6cc234e.1b033beeeb4342be9be2.js
138 ms
5841b314fbd5b9a7354b425a2fff4829b020abab.82d4da1b52af2e024e4c.js
137 ms
b866d7f66c3e15f8412437c49e8d84ccd35323b5.ed77cbb0c5803611cae5.js
156 ms
styles.336e452d6bae11bf0ae8.js
155 ms
_app-55c532bd0d202bf056b4.js
190 ms
1d04f423d901b0f77a9746658c3b294b28a6b1f4.937f16149fb5cf196af6.js
158 ms
e5b0dd6b390a50924b5308ae9701a95855d76bcc.a7524bf3cdf0264d9c98.js
161 ms
bdf043a7d455d70e8e20073ae443f8286d702a80.87a2c33b8c935b226eb7.js
157 ms
8ecf848f157613906dd2356697fb9c408065f0c7.5cb10630704d5c8aea56.js
162 ms
c01282172466fef30fb3d031b808e8cafaa9507d.815ecb58aba2d7a3aca2.js
162 ms
68b47971a608321b8310a36d60d815a7ea01bd3b.5066380663e56b081af9.js
162 ms
d8f20c4d31ee4a58277eaa13338e217ef9bbf925.a9a53aa5e847ca1dfbab.js
162 ms
fce723bbc31f015dcb6404b47d741b75905b1a84.2a9c3335506e04a83806.js
187 ms
index-acc943074f47b3abb7e7.js
186 ms
_buildManifest.js
172 ms
_ssgManifest.js
171 ms
logo-v2-150x150.png
172 ms
computer-with-dashboard-800x466.png
182 ms
lighthouse-metrics-chart-600x486.png
186 ms
octocat-300x300.png
182 ms
jenkins-300x300.png
182 ms
circle-ci-300x300.png
176 ms
slack-window-600x376.png
136 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff
79 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff
101 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff
110 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff
111 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff
111 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff
109 ms
2022-02-web-components-and-react.png
140 ms
2023-04-lighthouse-10.png
135 ms
2022-01-tutorials-1.png
126 ms
2021-11-lighthouse-9.png
107 ms
2022-12-how-to-learn-react.png
107 ms
2022-01-tutorial-slack-logo.png
79 ms
2022-01-tutorial-lighthouse-logo.png
97 ms
foo.software accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
foo.software best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
foo.software SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foo.software can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foo.software main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foo.software
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: