Tools & Wizards About Us
foodgood.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

foodgood.in

Indian Food Recipes| World Cuisines| Indian Cooking Guide

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

440 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

658 ms

foodgood.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to foodgood.in homepage info - get ready to check Food Good best content right away, or after learning these important things about foodgood.in

Get complete information on Indian food recipes and cuisines. The Indian cooking guide for your favourite dishes and food.

Visit foodgood.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Foodgood.in page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foodgood.in performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foodgood.in

440 ms

foodgood.in

1025 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

194 ms

style.min.css

384 ms

classic-themes.min.css

572 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Foodgood.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Foodgood.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381.0 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Foodgood.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 285.0 kB

  • Original 324.5 kB
  • After minification 313.4 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 285.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 44.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 973.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Food Good images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 528.5 kB
  • After minification 528.5 kB
  • After compression 509.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 137.6 kB
  • After minification 123.0 kB
  • After compression 105.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodgood.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (72%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Food Good. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

foodgood.in

foodgood.in

440 ms

foodgood.in

foodgood.in

1025 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

194 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

384 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

572 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

774 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

593 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

596 ms

redfont.css

redfont.css

603 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

605 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

759 ms

style.css

style.css

1195 ms

style.css

style.css

788 ms

css

css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1003 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

802 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

942 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

959 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

988 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1003 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1130 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1151 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1259 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1260 ms

clipboard.min.js

clipboard.min.js

1260 ms

moxie.min.js

moxie.min.js

1325 ms

plupload.min.js

plupload.min.js

1344 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1384 ms

handlers.min.js

handlers.min.js

1389 ms

js

js

80 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

81 ms

js

js

118 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1548 ms

frontend-form.js

frontend-form.js

1548 ms

repeat-field.js

repeat-field.js

1548 ms

conditional-logic.js

conditional-logic.js

1549 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1618 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

1618 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

1618 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

1619 ms

suggest.min.js

suggest.min.js

1771 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

1869 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

1702 ms

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js

1510 ms

upload.js

upload.js

1414 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1391 ms

html5.js

html5.js

1392 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

1479 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

1478 ms

scripting.js

scripting.js

1322 ms

megamenu.js

megamenu.js

1390 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

1381 ms

affix.js

affix.js

1358 ms

parallax-img.js

parallax-img.js

1301 ms

slick.js

slick.js

1282 ms

flexslider.js

flexslider.js

1248 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

833 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

1105 ms

Shakshuka-4.jpg

Shakshuka-4.jpg

1455 ms

lazy-placeholder-4-450x300.jpg

lazy-placeholder-4-450x300.jpg

1108 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

1108 ms

admin.jpg

admin.jpg

1109 ms

food-vector-pattern-4.jpg

food-vector-pattern-4.jpg

1109 ms

pineapplecut-4.png

pineapplecut-4.png

1110 ms

lazy-placeholder-4-1200x450.jpg

lazy-placeholder-4-1200x450.jpg

1177 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

187 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

95 ms

js

js

192 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

185 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf

279 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf

281 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

381 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

382 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

381 ms

redfont.woff

redfont.woff

1523 ms

ads

ads

197 ms

collect

collect

130 ms

collect

collect

116 ms

rule-of-third-01-694x450.png

rule-of-third-01-694x450.png

1127 ms

pexels-photo-693267-1200x450.jpeg

pexels-photo-693267-1200x450.jpeg

402 ms

Groundnut-Right-1-450x300.png

Groundnut-Right-1-450x300.png

598 ms

karimeen-mappas-450x300.jpg

karimeen-mappas-450x300.jpg

203 ms

web-450x300.jpg

web-450x300.jpg

396 ms

sodar

sodar

48 ms

Accessibility Review

foodgood.in accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

foodgood.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

foodgood.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodgood.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodgood.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

foodgood.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Food Good. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: