3.4 sec in total
232 ms
2.7 sec
553 ms
Welcome to foodwatch.org homepage info - get ready to check Foodwatch best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about foodwatch.org
foodwatch is an independent, non-profit organisation that exposes food-industry practices that are not in the interests of consumers.
Visit foodwatch.orgWe analyzed Foodwatch.org page load time and found that the first response time was 232 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
foodwatch.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.316
37/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
232 ms
384 ms
191 ms
192 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Foodwatch.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (788 ms) belongs to the original domain Foodwatch.org.
Page size can be reduced by 157.8 kB (5%)
3.3 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodwatch.org main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foodwatch images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (27%)
22
16
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodwatch.org
232 ms
foodwatch.org
384 ms
www.foodwatch.org
191 ms
foodwatch-international
192 ms
merged-154842a2dbc5e03921b87df1ae26826d-f7d5a4981a74be017183a31b3dc6a2d9.css
198 ms
merged-79e05296f176944d426a4f1f4e53549f-b95fdd3e67c6920e1d4296e2aa7c8095.js
276 ms
main.concat-d08ff5d6f75e5fd97fa699e39f55f791.js
634 ms
js.cookie.min-b2f601760053bfdbefe5e1169c191beb.js
358 ms
cookieman-0bc2d9aa5721ab2fd87306fcdf22005e.js
358 ms
cookieman-theme-e7dcb8eabe4eb98e5e3a7196686cf40a.js
359 ms
cookieman-init-e25f19015b879309339f7b11e018db6c.js
359 ms
merged-4582f9b150b42702d2426ce1847287e1-621de56c157259a815285892801d51c0.js
361 ms
svg-sprite-cf32661a.svg
100 ms
csm_Mineral-bottled-water-scandal_1_1_504ac01dc8.jpg
465 ms
csm_Foodwatch_Website_2ed359d855.jpg
392 ms
csm_FW_Mineral_Oil_2310x1291_INT_%402x-100_f5c657e6e7.jpg
391 ms
csm_2020-10-28_Nutriscore_125559727_picturealliance-Franz-Peter_Tschauner_nachricht_2310x1299px_016b9000b6.jpg
236 ms
csm_2310x1291__1__e42ad7ae3d.jpg
194 ms
csm_Webseiten-Titelbild_c3d4341b7d.png
757 ms
Motiv_Oel-im-Reis.png
787 ms
Motiv_Ampelkennzeichnung.png
788 ms
csm_ignat-dolomanov-unsplash_3513x1506_fa18e9db24.jpg
463 ms
csm_240614_foodwatch_Legislatives_extreme-droite_0c65b10464.png
655 ms
csm_Gruppenbild_Marktcheck_Kinder-Fruchtsnacks_Website_598f047aa1.png
648 ms
csm_SInaasappel_1200x628_fe69e557e8.jpg
556 ms
csm_Kinder_Energydrinks_09407acaf8.png
742 ms
neuton-v10-latin-regular.woff
691 ms
neuton-v10-latin-300.woff
703 ms
neuton-v10-latin-700.woff
783 ms
foodwatch.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
foodwatch.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
foodwatch.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodwatch.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodwatch.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodwatch.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foodwatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: