2.4 sec in total
194 ms
2.1 sec
142 ms
Welcome to foodwatch.org homepage info - get ready to check Foodwatch best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about foodwatch.org
foodwatch is an independent, non-profit organisation that exposes food-industry practices that are not in the interests of consumers.
Visit foodwatch.orgWe analyzed Foodwatch.org page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
foodwatch.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.725
7/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
194 ms
191 ms
296 ms
151 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Foodwatch.org, 6% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (671 ms) belongs to the original domain Foodwatch.org.
Page size can be reduced by 732.1 kB (56%)
1.3 MB
579.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Foodwatch.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 512.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foodwatch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 334.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 352.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodwatch.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 352.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (67%)
60
20
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodwatch.org
194 ms
www.foodwatch.org
191 ms
296 ms
psx2bzw.js
151 ms
stylesheet_7592150310.css
81 ms
jquery-1.7.x-1.8.x-1.2.x.js
306 ms
colorbox.css
163 ms
socialshareprivacy.css
164 ms
cloud-carousel.1.0.5.js
165 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
165 ms
ZeroClipboard.js
169 ms
doubletaptogo.js
241 ms
jquery.charCount.js
242 ms
json2.js
245 ms
slick.min.js
247 ms
artnology.js
254 ms
slider.js
324 ms
mobile-navigation.js
325 ms
theme-navigation.js
324 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
325 ms
layout_homepage_template.css
335 ms
jquery.socialshareprivacy.js
375 ms
jquery.equalHeights.js
396 ms
www.foodwatch.org
141 ms
base.css
89 ms
basemod.css
98 ms
content.css
88 ms
buttons.css
86 ms
mobile-navigation.css
87 ms
slick.css
96 ms
slick-theme.css
244 ms
print.css
242 ms
7fthixcwCVo
71 ms
hand_engl.png
246 ms
x.gif
246 ms
de.gif
246 ms
fr.gif
247 ms
nl.gif
247 ms
logo_foodwatch_en.png
318 ms
foodwatch_europe_slider_530x290_02.jpg
671 ms
RTEmagicC_flag_germany_01.png.png
318 ms
RTEmagicC_flag_netherlands_50.png.png
319 ms
RTEmagicC_flag_france_50.png.png
330 ms
nahrungsmittel_poker_290_01.jpg
553 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
32 ms
www-embed-player.js
49 ms
base.js
72 ms
ga.js
89 ms
bg_body_std.png
103 ms
bg_topnav_search.png
104 ms
bg_pipes.png
114 ms
bg_focusbox.png
182 ms
sprites_ahrefs.png
269 ms
bg_focusbox_video.png
186 ms
counters.json
167 ms
localstorage-secure-helper.html
417 ms
overlay.png
235 ms
7fthixcwCVo
142 ms
sprites.png
274 ms
SIt46mD2F3Lh4uX0CEm8-bjrZdrN4kIKZv8mIYFoIEbff5zKggMmeMJ6Mk6g5MS.woff
33 ms
oiaIvI6-5Iza-Kevlq4nXESz8XXlQbuBRtlzru_N3pvff5aKggMmeMJ6Mk6g5Mb.woff
97 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
p.gif
167 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
12 ms
ad_status.js
14 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
13 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
18 ms
foodwatch.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
foodwatch.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
foodwatch.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodwatch.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodwatch.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodwatch.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foodwatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: