2.4 sec in total
293 ms
1.9 sec
172 ms
Click here to check amazing Footballjournals content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about footballjournals.com
The premium domain name footballjournals.com is available for sale!
Visit footballjournals.comWe analyzed Footballjournals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
footballjournals.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.067
97/100
15%
Value4.4 s
84/100
10%
293 ms
196 ms
61 ms
56 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Footballjournals.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 722.1 kB (63%)
1.2 MB
433.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Footballjournals.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 791.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Footballjournals needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 513.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 513.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Footballjournals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (75%)
95
24
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Footballjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
footballjournals.com
293 ms
monetate.js
196 ms
application.css
61 ms
ng-modal.css
56 ms
angular.min.js
70 ms
ng-modal.js
53 ms
google_analytics.js
50 ms
google_oauth.js
52 ms
bold_chat.js
54 ms
eloqua.js
55 ms
hotjar.js
55 ms
adroll.js
55 ms
impactRadius.js
56 ms
in.js
46 ms
api.js
57 ms
api:client.js
73 ms
app.js
60 ms
cookies.js
57 ms
socialMedia.js
59 ms
countryDropdown.js
55 ms
monetate.js
58 ms
index.js
60 ms
lander.js
60 ms
seoPages.js
62 ms
sitePages.js
61 ms
search.js
61 ms
modal.js
63 ms
forms.js
65 ms
tldSelector.js
63 ms
setFixedTop.js
64 ms
searchBar.js
64 ms
currency.js
66 ms
trust.js
66 ms
conversion.js
31 ms
tdfs-inner.css
66 ms
tdfs-temp.css
78 ms
thankyou.css
65 ms
entry.js
11 ms
css
24 ms
fontawesome.min.css
12 ms
bd-icons.min.css
15 ms
ga.js
28 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
154 ms
userspace
297 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
150 ms
recaptcha__en.js
307 ms
all.js
398 ms
299 ms
logo-header-2x.png
259 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
204 ms
288 ms
hotjar-10205.js
164 ms
elqCfg.min.js
151 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
132 ms
bg-select.png
137 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
131 ms
__utm.gif
124 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
58 ms
postmessageRelay
129 ms
__utm.gif
82 ms
__utm.gif
84 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
31 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
78 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
62 ms
svrGP
187 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
113 ms
framework
52 ms
92 ms
iframe
137 ms
anchor
128 ms
collect
175 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
117 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
66 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
102 ms
styles__ltr.css
21 ms
160 ms
svrGP.aspx
101 ms
xd_arbiter.php
242 ms
xd_arbiter.php
455 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
55 ms
webworker.js
102 ms
logo_48.png
52 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
54 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
97 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
99 ms
iframerpc
42 ms
recaptcha__en.js
18 ms
vms.js
75 ms
roundtrip.js
14 ms
xd_arbiter.php
187 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
153 ms
bc.pv
85 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
79 ms
out
10 ms
51 ms
7 ms
34 ms
out
23 ms
out
23 ms
out
29 ms
out
32 ms
out
51 ms
out
51 ms
out
50 ms
out
41 ms
49 ms
u.php
65 ms
adsct
96 ms
pixel
54 ms
30 ms
sync
18 ms
377928.gif
22 ms
26 ms
in
8 ms
tap.php
37 ms
sd
25 ms
footballjournals.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
footballjournals.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
footballjournals.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Footballjournals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Footballjournals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
footballjournals.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Footballjournals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: