3.5 sec in total
490 ms
2.9 sec
120 ms
Click here to check amazing Foot Comfort content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about footcomfort.gr
Visit footcomfort.grWe analyzed Footcomfort.gr page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
footcomfort.gr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
13/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
490 ms
288 ms
545 ms
96 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Footcomfort.gr, 50% (42 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain Footcomfort.gr.
Page size can be reduced by 119.2 kB (16%)
730.8 kB
611.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Footcomfort.gr main page is 730.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 642.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foot Comfort images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 83.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Footcomfort.gr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (90%)
39
4
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foot Comfort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
footcomfort.gr
490 ms
www.footcomfort.gr
288 ms
www.footcomfort.gr
545 ms
styles.css
96 ms
style.min.css
190 ms
theme.min.css
285 ms
header-footer.min.css
288 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
384 ms
post-7.css
288 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
289 ms
swiper.min.css
290 ms
global.css
378 ms
post-8.css
380 ms
leaflet.css
381 ms
mapbox-gl.css
390 ms
L.Icon.FontAwesome.css
391 ms
osm-map-elementor.css
472 ms
style.css
474 ms
css
47 ms
jquery.min.js
569 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
477 ms
leaflet.js
583 ms
mapbox-gl.js
959 ms
leaflet-mapbox-gl.js
566 ms
L.Icon.FontAwesome.js
567 ms
index.js
582 ms
index.js
660 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
662 ms
api.js
55 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
663 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
666 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
670 ms
index.js
753 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
755 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
757 ms
waypoints.min.js
761 ms
core.min.js
765 ms
frontend.min.js
848 ms
footcomfort-logo.png
127 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
41 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
113 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
118 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
119 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
118 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff
117 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
124 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-AMP6lbBP.woff
118 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
124 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
126 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff
124 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-AMP6lbBP.woff
125 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff
125 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
126 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-AMP6lbBP.woff
127 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
126 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
137 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff
136 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc-AMP6lbBP.woff
137 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff
138 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff
138 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQXKMnyrYk.woff
169 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxHIzQXKMnyrYk.woff
138 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxLIzQXKMnyrYk.woff
139 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxEIzQXKMnyrYk.woff
139 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxMIzQXKMnyrYk.woff
140 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxFIzQXKMnyrYk.woff
139 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
140 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff
141 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
158 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
141 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff
142 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff
142 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff
143 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
155 ms
recaptcha__en.js
44 ms
embed
379 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-AMP6lbBP.woff
120 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
114 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBxc-AMP6lbBP.woff
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCBc-AMP6lbBP.woff
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc-AMP6lbBP.woff
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCRc-AMP6lbBP.woff
46 ms
js
61 ms
footcomfort.gr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
footcomfort.gr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
footcomfort.gr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EL
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Footcomfort.gr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Greek is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Footcomfort.gr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
footcomfort.gr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foot Comfort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: