Tools & Wizards About Us
fopol.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

fopol.eu

FOPOL - armchairs, swivel chairs, table bases, hangers,steel legs and frames

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

967 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

112 ms

fopol.eu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing FOPOL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fopol.eu

FOPOL - armchairs, swivel chairs, table bases, hangers, steel legs and frames. Cheap prices, large slelection

Visit fopol.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Fopol.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 967 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fopol.eu performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.331

34/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fopol.eu

967 ms

Nzo0ODc6NS4yNC4zOQ.css

337 ms

main.d339c7471805d5aab74c.min.js

1015 ms

en_GB.js

447 ms

user.js

449 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Fopol.eu, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Dcsaascdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Fopol.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 265.4 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fopol.eu main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 845.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 156.1 kB

  • Original 174.8 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 71.7 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 86.2 kB

  • Original 845.3 kB
  • After minification 759.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FOPOL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 288.9 kB
  • After minification 286.8 kB
  • After compression 265.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 52.8 kB
  • After minification 52.8 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fopol.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (26%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FOPOL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fopol.eu

fopol.eu

967 ms

Nzo0ODc6NS4yNC4zOQ.css

Nzo0ODc6NS4yNC4zOQ.css

337 ms

main.d339c7471805d5aab74c.min.js

main.d339c7471805d5aab74c.min.js

1015 ms

en_GB.js

en_GB.js

447 ms

user.js

user.js

449 ms

front-api-1.4.0.min.js

front-api-1.4.0.min.js

633 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

73 ms

shop.js

shop.js

599 ms

1px.gif

1px.gif

115 ms

logo.png

logo.png

118 ms

b26fcd0ff18cb14edf4e42638c5a2238.png

b26fcd0ff18cb14edf4e42638c5a2238.png

340 ms

a45ba670bde9c05a4f659caaf7c43b98.png

a45ba670bde9c05a4f659caaf7c43b98.png

460 ms

d66a3bd6292b20a0c5a01efe1902fc67.png

d66a3bd6292b20a0c5a01efe1902fc67.png

338 ms

aad00cb512e8053c499b888eae05bbb3.png

aad00cb512e8053c499b888eae05bbb3.png

338 ms

7656313c367f3bd02a83cbdf28296b68.png

7656313c367f3bd02a83cbdf28296b68.png

230 ms

5b320ab6d9972134774607902c2dea95.png

5b320ab6d9972134774607902c2dea95.png

343 ms

68902b07520ab7b1650eeada09f25698.png

68902b07520ab7b1650eeada09f25698.png

570 ms

8a75efe466fe431ad9aa8b1c6b145f2b.png

8a75efe466fe431ad9aa8b1c6b145f2b.png

571 ms

651bcfafcd091f41704cb94d21bb5788.png

651bcfafcd091f41704cb94d21bb5788.png

569 ms

4af5155c7ad80a5fb3e85aa91b96060f.png

4af5155c7ad80a5fb3e85aa91b96060f.png

687 ms

78bf6987387bd52bdf776f584f91210f.jpg

78bf6987387bd52bdf776f584f91210f.jpg

455 ms

logo_background.png

logo_background.png

543 ms

rwd-custom.woff

rwd-custom.woff

507 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

613 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

619 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

js

js

69 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

114 ms

Accessibility Review

fopol.eu accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fopol.eu best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

fopol.eu SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fopol.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fopol.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fopol.eu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FOPOL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: