8.1 sec in total
281 ms
7.2 sec
566 ms
Welcome to forbetterforworse.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check For Better Worse best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about forbetterforworse.co.uk
For Better For Worse is the go-to wedding directory for wedding venues, suppliers, late dates and all the inspiration you will ever need!
Visit forbetterforworse.co.ukWe analyzed Forbetterforworse.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
forbetterforworse.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
281 ms
549 ms
169 ms
166 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Forbetterforworse.co.uk, 7% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Forbetterforworse.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 195.1 kB (9%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Forbetterforworse.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. For Better Worse images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 55.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forbetterforworse.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (25%)
102
76
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of For Better Worse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
forbetterforworse.co.uk
281 ms
www.forbetterforworse.co.uk
549 ms
style.css
169 ms
pgwslider.css
166 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
html5shiv.js
201 ms
fbfw.js
205 ms
customSelect.jquery.min.js
205 ms
pgwslider.min.js
226 ms
css
29 ms
adsbygoogle.js
19 ms
pagebg.jpg
211 ms
ajs.php
180 ms
logo.png
290 ms
showpic2.php
290 ms
showpic2.php
245 ms
showpic2.php
289 ms
fb.png
192 ms
tw.png
358 ms
mag.png
362 ms
facebook3.png
396 ms
twitter2.png
531 ms
datecheck.png
533 ms
1355.jpg
1025 ms
1769.jpg
1744 ms
6267.jpg
1697 ms
7092.jpg
1775 ms
7907.jpg
1960 ms
1618.jpg
1938 ms
392.jpg
2567 ms
8292.jpg
2529 ms
3602.jpg
2548 ms
11576.jpg
2543 ms
8144.jpg
2545 ms
1451.jpg
2573 ms
5855.jpg
3125 ms
11943.jpg
3702 ms
2299.jpg
3198 ms
6205.jpg
3073 ms
12081.jpg
3125 ms
11431.jpg
3269 ms
5959.jpg
3644 ms
8290.jpg
3656 ms
468.jpg
3747 ms
1569.jpg
3739 ms
9111.jpg
3743 ms
10485.jpg
4291 ms
cEqoveWhAOsq4j2QPMUWZA.ttf
74 ms
2630.jpg
4217 ms
ca-pub-1447370824569277.js
231 ms
zrt_lookup.html
239 ms
show_ads_impl.js
78 ms
ads
455 ms
osd.js
115 ms
lg.php
110 ms
1130.jpg
4126 ms
ads
379 ms
11557.jpg
4144 ms
ads
345 ms
6533.jpg
4083 ms
Hm1qjDlZpOdVXoa-QGE7_w.ttf
33 ms
ads
255 ms
barnim.jpg
4165 ms
historicim.jpg
4239 ms
hotels.jpg
4573 ms
match.aspx
69 ms
ads
196 ms
castle.jpg
4425 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
px.js
141 ms
counter.js
15 ms
golfgreen.jpg
4473 ms
museum.jpg
4477 ms
t.php
176 ms
unusual.jpg
4490 ms
couple.jpg
4426 ms
abg.js
108 ms
collect
53 ms
pixel
289 ms
m_js_controller.js
145 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
262 ms
7538803748663318982
249 ms
14955418220560734159
238 ms
13762158982086362740
230 ms
s
161 ms
x_button_blue2.png
127 ms
pink-member_3.jpg
158 ms
ca.png
390 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
19 ms
ca.png
381 ms
country.jpg
4051 ms
restaurant.jpg
3813 ms
inns.jpg
3763 ms
tourist.jpg
3715 ms
activeview
27 ms
activeview
27 ms
waterside.jpg
3657 ms
garden.jpg
3740 ms
cool.jpg
3194 ms
white-dove.jpg
3607 ms
middletemple.jpg
3502 ms
temple.jpg
3205 ms
kew.jpg
3272 ms
wakehurst.jpg
3368 ms
boe.jpg
2877 ms
downarrow.png
2791 ms
rtarrow.png
2874 ms
forbetterforworse.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
forbetterforworse.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
forbetterforworse.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forbetterforworse.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Forbetterforworse.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
forbetterforworse.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of For Better Worse. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: