5.4 sec in total
254 ms
2.1 sec
3.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Forest content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about forest.design
Cost effective website design & SEO services that help your business grow online. Forest Web Design Reading, Berkshire.
Visit forest.designWe analyzed Forest.design page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
forest.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
65/100
10%
254 ms
958 ms
88 ms
168 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Forest.design, 69% (25 requests) were made to Website-designer-reading.co.uk and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) relates to the external source Website-designer-reading.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 148.5 kB (23%)
632.8 kB
484.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Forest.design main page is 632.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 357.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Forest images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 533 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 159 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forest.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)
31
13
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
forest.design
254 ms
website-designer-reading.co.uk
958 ms
style.min.css
88 ms
styles.css
168 ms
main.min.css
233 ms
css
31 ms
style-5435.css
233 ms
offside.min.css
236 ms
navigation-branding-flex.min.css
237 ms
jquery.min.js
328 ms
js
61 ms
sticky.min.js
247 ms
offside.min.js
307 ms
index.js
310 ms
index.js
312 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
314 ms
menu.min.js
440 ms
back-to-top.min.js
441 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
440 ms
bg-seo-2.jpg
245 ms
dots-1.svg
99 ms
contact-bg.jpg
349 ms
tick.svg
102 ms
blob.svg
124 ms
abstract-shapes.svg
125 ms
chevron.svg
244 ms
web-design-reading-bg-1.jpg
494 ms
js
156 ms
analytics.js
148 ms
QdVPSTAyLFyeg_IDWvOJmVES_Hw3BX8.ttf
152 ms
QdVMSTAyLFyeg_IDWvOJmVES_HScJ281Rbg.ttf
252 ms
QdVMSTAyLFyeg_IDWvOJmVES_HSMIG81Rbg.ttf
253 ms
cropped-chevron.png
185 ms
collect
101 ms
66 ms
33 ms
forest.design accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
forest.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
forest.design SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forest.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Forest.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
forest.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Forest. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: